- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 10/17/11 at 4:22 pm to Dr RC
quote:
They are currently in the SCAC where there are two other teams called the Tigers.
This is OK because the SWAC sucks and nobody pays attention to it.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 5:46 pm to HooDooWitch
Yea they are in the Southern Collegiate Athletic Conference (SCAC) not the Southwestern Athletic Conference (SWAC) which are all black universities.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:15 pm to signalizer
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:19 pm to Sidewinder
quote:
After Missouri applies, the person said that it expects “no problems” with gathering enough votes among SEC presidents to become a member.
This tells me one thing: Mizzou to the East.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:26 pm to Monticello
quote:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
After Missouri applies, the person said that it expects “no problems” with gathering enough votes among SEC presidents to become a member.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This tells me one thing: Mizzou to the East.
I agree. I don't really care that much whether AU ends up going East. I would prefer it, but Mizzou to the SEC is the more important thing.
I just kinda enjoy the opportunity to call bama chicken.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 6:32 pm to Monticello
Frankly moving Auburn to the east makes the most sense for leveling up the two divisions.
Yes I know it's going to cause problems, but at some point in time we've just got to let it go.
Have a coin toss as to which rivalry gets kept, Bama versus Tenn, or Bama versus Auburn and the other goes into the trash bin...for now. Hell I'll flip the coin and everyone who knows me knows how much I hate Tennessee and would love to keep them on the annual beating schedule. I can live with fate, or luck deciding.
Either the SEC must grow, and grow correctly which means the divisions making sense from a logistics standpoint for the teams playing in them as well as a balance point from the strength of the teams in them, or it will begin to die.
Yes I know it's going to cause problems, but at some point in time we've just got to let it go.
Have a coin toss as to which rivalry gets kept, Bama versus Tenn, or Bama versus Auburn and the other goes into the trash bin...for now. Hell I'll flip the coin and everyone who knows me knows how much I hate Tennessee and would love to keep them on the annual beating schedule. I can live with fate, or luck deciding.
Either the SEC must grow, and grow correctly which means the divisions making sense from a logistics standpoint for the teams playing in them as well as a balance point from the strength of the teams in them, or it will begin to die.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 7:08 pm to llfshoals
HFShoals I disagree, Mizzou in the east makes perfect sense really. This sets up perfect for a few years down the road getting okie state and Ou or get two east coast teams and then you put 8 teams in each Div.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 7:31 pm to bamalee
quote:
HFShoals I disagree, Mizzou in the east makes perfect sense really. This sets up perfect for a few years down the road getting okie state and Ou or get two east coast teams and then you put 8 teams in each Div.
You don't know where your next teams are going to come from. When you have them in place, then you adjust for what makes the most sense there.
If you want to add a team for the east that will strengthen it because you don't want to affect how the west is structured, add someone who will measurably improve the east, as I'm sure you would agree the east needs some shoring up.
Missouri is not that team.
Posted on 10/17/11 at 8:02 pm to llfshoals
quote:Maybe they won't shore up the SEC East or West, but it seems inevitable that Mizzou is heading in an SEC direction. WVU would have shored up things in the football dept. for the East, but apparently Slive saw $$$ and TV sets to be more important than football prowess. So we get Mizzou and not the Mountaineers this go-round. Maybe.
Missouri is not that team.
If so, welcome mizzou/sorry 'neers. We'll all adjust.
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News