quote:Nothing is a basis for striking out in the city in this way, but it could be the hutbag's motivation. However, based on the history of bombings in the US, the two most rational types to profile would be islamic extremists and anti government (right wing) extremists.
So a pissed off leftwing nutbag that feels the rich haven't paid their fair share, or that taxes aren't high enough wouldn't be a basis for striking out a city that opposed taxation?
the two most rational types to profile would be islamic extremists or anti government (right wing) extremists.
quote:No. I'm a conservative and not pissed because I'm not an extremist nutbag.
So you can't see why people of the conversvative slant wouldn't be pissed?
quote:If they do it. I say call them out and deal with each incident and the individuals that do it. I just think it has gotten to a point of gross over generalizations and created a victim mentality among conservatives that is shameful. Debate the issues, facts, specifics of each incident on its merits and be better than the opposition.
hese are the same corksackers that paint all repubs as rascist homophobes that all think like that idiot Akin.
Debate the issues, facts, specifics of each incident on its merits and be better than the opposition.
No. I'm a conservative and not pissed because I'm not an extremist nutbag.
Just like I wouldn't understand a muslim being pissed for the media speculating about the perps being islamic extremists.
quote:Are you intentionally missing the obvious point of my post?
The what the frick are you doing dealing in theoretical arguments?
quote:Why read it all republicans? that is like reading racism into everything or muslim into the comment of islamic extremist.
The facts are it could have been a leftwing nutbag, however only rightwing (read all Repubs) were considered.
Why read it all republicans?
quote:Over generalization that then causes the boogeyman to be around every corner. You are providing evidence to support my contention.
Every fricking time something happens they spin it into a repub (not nutbag) issude.
quote:Why does one only need to look at one instance? That is my point. Let's deal with each instance on its own merits and stop with the victim mentality and reading preconceived notions into everything.
One only needs to look at hat the Dems did with Akin
quote:Ok. Call that tard out and make him look foolish. Don't over generalize it.
frick yesterday some tard on here was claiming Romney supported and believed in Akin.
. You are providing evidence to support my contention.
Why does one only need to look at one instance?
Why is it the MSM's fault that the authorities pointed their investigation toward the wrong persons initially?
quote:What? The media reported who the investigators were looking at. The media didn't get it wrong. But that doesn't fit the narrative of the MSM you want to perpetuate at every turn.
Links should abound to support authorites claiming a potential righty did it.
I remember plenty leading up to the election.
WHAT DOES THIS HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING??????
The media reported who the investigators were looking at
quote:NO I DON'T. I have said repeatedly that the MSM in general is left leaning. However, this is a generalization that isn't fair to all in the media. I used it as an example of people blaming the MSM because it fits a preconceived meme of the victim mentality that is taking over the conservatives on this board.
I mean frick you use that as an example of the MSM being ok.