- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Would someone please explain the crimes Trump committed?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:46 am
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:46 am
He is in court in NY defending himself against allegedly falsifying financial records in order to commit a crime. So where is the crime?
He is being accused of trying to overthrow an election, and instigating Jan 6. Again, where is the crime?
Any assistance you may offer would be much appreciated.
He is being accused of trying to overthrow an election, and instigating Jan 6. Again, where is the crime?
Any assistance you may offer would be much appreciated.
16
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:48 am to rebeloke
It was her turn dammit. That’s about all I can think of.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:48 am to rebeloke
quote:
He is in court in NY defending himself against allegedly falsifying financial records in order to commit a crime. So where is the crime?
Instead of paying his attorney (or women) directly with a set payment, he had his attorney make payments. Then the attorney sent invoices to Trump for random amounts as a retainer fee. This was all done to disguise the payments from the company to the women (for plausible deniability, presumably).
The wacky NY records law has an expansive view of fraudulent business records, and the allegation is that the obfuscations I posted above was fraud, per the statute.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:49 am to rebeloke
He screwed Hillary out of her turn.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:49 am to rebeloke
Threatening the Establishment.
I know you want more. But that is the case.
I know you want more. But that is the case.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:53 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Instead of paying his attorney (or women) directly with a set payment, he had his attorney make payments. Then the attorney sent invoices to Trump for random amounts as a retainer fee. This was all done to disguise the payments from the company to the women (for plausible deniability, presumably).
The wacky NY records law has an expansive view of fraudulent business records, and the allegation is that the obfuscations I posted above was fraud, per the statute.
Cool. Maybe that is what happened. Now PROVE Trump knew where the money was going.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:54 am to MightyYat
quote:
Cool. Maybe that is what happened
Sounds like Pecker described it differently.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:54 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
The wacky NY records law has an expansive view of fraudulent business records, and the allegation is that the obfuscations I posted above was fraud, per the statute.
Does ny law not require an injured party? Is the claim he didn't pay proper taxes?
What would have been the pretext for the investigation that would have uncovered the business records errors.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:55 am to dstone12
quote:
Threatening the Establishment.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:55 am to rebeloke
SFP will be here shortly to explain to us
He is so smart
He is so smart
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:55 am to MightyYat
quote:
. Now PROVE Trump knew where the money was going.
We haven't seen all the evidence, but we all expect parties involved to testify to this. There will likely be documentation around this scheme, too.
Trump worked directly with Cohen, allegedly on this, so while there will be credibility disputes, Cohen can testify directly about this.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:56 am to rebeloke
Such things are in ideological DNA of communists.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:56 am to MightyYat
quote:
Now PROVE Trump knew where the money was going.
He's on tape asking about it, and multiple witnesses have/will testify that he knew what it was about. Pecker already did this week.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:57 am to Turbeauxdog
quote:
Does ny law not require an injured party?
Not for their statute. It's a regulation on businesses.
It's the same thing as the other trial. Same statute.
quote:
Is the claim he didn't pay proper taxes?
No. It's fraud-based.
quote:
What would have been the pretext for the investigation that would have uncovered the business records errors.
The lawyer who handled it being prosecuted for related crimes, for starters
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:58 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Instead of paying his attorney (or women) directly with a set payment, he had his attorney make payments. Then the attorney sent invoices to Trump for random amounts as a retainer fee. This was all done to disguise the payments from the company to the women (for plausible deniability, presumably).
Didn’t Cohen surreptitiously record Trump regarding these payments and Trump said “make sure everything is on the up and up?” Where is the mens rea?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:59 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
We haven't seen all the evidence, but we all expect parties involved to testify to this. There will likely be documentation around this scheme, too.
Trump worked directly with Cohen, allegedly on this, so while there will be credibility disputes, Cohen can testify directly about this.
There better be some rock-solid evidence. Otherwise, all the other shite is just hearsay. They better have something from Trump directly ordering the payments. If there is anything less than that this is a complete waste of time.
Posted on 4/26/24 at 10:59 am to BamaAtl
quote:
He's on tape asking about it
He’s on tape telling cohen “do it all on the up and up”.
This post was edited on 4/26/24 at 11:01 am
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:00 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Does ny law not require an injured party?
Yes... the ole "You defrauded someone who themselves says they weren't defrauded by you".
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:01 am to rebeloke
quote:
Would someone please explain the crimes Trump committed?
Posted on 4/26/24 at 11:01 am to SlowFlowPro
Justice Barrett pretty much destroyed any basis for states to ever bring cases like this against Executives and Dreebun conceded this.
The DOJ lost yesterday, big time...
The DOJ lost yesterday, big time...
Page 1 of 8
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News