- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Trump mandates all EPA data to be reviewed prior to release
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:18 pm to joshnorris14
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:18 pm to joshnorris14
quote:I'm sure mandating a political review of all scientific conclusions will make things much faster
Again, what happened in Flint and why did it take the EPA 7 months to do anything?
This post was edited on 1/25/17 at 4:18 pm
0
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:18 pm to joshnorris14
If it relates to his policies, I have no problem with it going through his staffers for approval. Having a dept head stating a policy view that doesn't match the administration would be undermining the executive.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:18 pm to Iosh
What information was the EPA releasing the past 8 years that the white house was not aware of?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:19 pm to joshnorris14
EPA is large bloated and is full of leftists.
The goal of the EPA today is not clean air and water.
It is instead socialism anti-capitalism and the elimination of private property rights.
The goal of the EPA today is not clean air and water.
It is instead socialism anti-capitalism and the elimination of private property rights.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:19 pm to joshnorris14
So trumps staff will see the scientific news before it is public and make a fortune on insider information.
Seems sound.
Seems sound.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:19 pm to joshnorris14
I don't want our government to peddle unproven theories as facts.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:19 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
They aren't independent. They work for someone, and that person is the President
They are bound by much more than the sitting president.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:19 pm to Fun Bunch
What is the point of him and "his people" reviewing something they have no grasp on? One of "his people" is an Exxon mobile exec. Shut the frick up stop defending stupid shite.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:20 pm to rocket31
They work on behalf of the President
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:20 pm to mahdragonz
quote:
So trumps staff will see the scientific news before it is public and make a fortune on insider information.
Seems sound.
You realize the EPA is Trump's staff, right?
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:20 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
The EPA is Orwellian and is government. This IS restricting the power of government. Again, what happened in Flint and why did it take the EPA 7 months to do anything?
No it's not, it's just twisting an agency to spout propaganda that suits your needs and censor what you want censored. Turning what shouldn't be political (other side is guilty too) into something political. Convince yourself otherwise though, fight that good fight.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:21 pm to DavidTheGnome
I want the EPA abolished. Them being silenced is a distant second for me.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:21 pm to olddawg26
lol wat
Again...this is not an independent scientific company.
They work for HIM.
You think this is anything new? You think the EPA was just releasing shite left and right that wasn't approved by Obama.
Ya'll are extremely stupid.
Again...this is not an independent scientific company.
They work for HIM.
You think this is anything new? You think the EPA was just releasing shite left and right that wasn't approved by Obama.
Ya'll are extremely stupid.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:22 pm to joshnorris14
quote:
The only reason he is capable of doing that is because the organization is filled with Leftists acting on their political beliefs
Then clean them out, Josh. I'm not disagreeing with you on that point.
Hell, just shutter the entire agency (probably your preference) if the boss can't trust its conclusions. Or replace those that produce the data. But the OP is the worst fix, IMO.
This post was edited on 1/25/17 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:22 pm to NIH
quote:
They work on behalf of the President
They work on behalf of the United States. We don't have a frickin dictator.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:22 pm to Fun Bunch
quote:
You think this is anything new? You think the EPA was just releasing shite left and right that wasn't approved by Obama.
Ya'll are extremely stupid.
I'm not being flip, but I honestly don't understand what people here even think they are arguing.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:23 pm to NIH
Til we are North Korea
This post was edited on 1/25/17 at 4:24 pm
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:23 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
They work on behalf of the United States. We don't have a frickin dictator.
This is so freaking inane. They are part of the EXECUTIVE DEPARTMENT.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:24 pm to DavidTheGnome
quote:
They work on behalf of the United States.
They are a member of the Executive Branch. The President is their boss.
I'm not sure what you don't understand about this.
Posted on 1/25/17 at 4:24 pm to MSMHater
quote:
Then clean them out, Josh. I'm not disagreeing with you on that point.
You do realize that is exactly what he's doing, right?
Page 4 of 17
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News