re: Trump mandates all EPA data to be reviewed prior to release

quote:

---

Independent scientists can test and comment.

---

sure.

But who pays for that? Local gov create a new 6 figure position and purchase the required equipment? or private company that may not have credentials to analyze certain situations or take a month to mobilize?

quote:

---

What if the data that Trump's staff has is conflicting with what the EPA wants to release?

---

Under what circumstances would the White House have data independent of the EPA? I don't think there are scientists on Trump's staff, so they wouldn't have any method of conducting independent data collection.

I guess they could solicit some data collection from another agency or a state, but even in that case, I don't see why you wouldn't want all data released, since it would be better for conflicts to be resolved by peer review rather than the administration thumbing the scale for a preferred conclusion.

quote:

---

EPA and all of their snowflake liberal bureaucrat Democrats WILL NOW bend to the Will of the POTUS.

---

I see a lot of people describing this as 'science'. They seem to be confusing the political nature of the EPA and the difference between modeling and science

I wonder if this is the same type of "breaking" news that's been debunked in the last two days (social media, black sites)

You don't think the admin could have access to outside data that could counter the EPA's data? I think there could very well be independent study data that could disagree with EPA info. Why release the EPA info as gospel just because it's the EPA?

Then you release both findings, dumbass

Hopefully Trump will make a bunch of them quit.

quote:

---

I wonder if this is the same type of "breaking" news that's been debunked in the last two days (social media, black sites)

---

You think a White House denial of something constitutes "debunking?"