Started By
Message

re: "Penalties Against Possession of A Drug Should Be No More Damaging Than The Drug Itself"

Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:16 am to
Posted by cwill
Member since Jan 2005
54752 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:16 am to
quote:

Thousands of kids have died over the years from potheads driving around "high".


That's simply not true. The real killer is alcohol.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422503 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:17 am to
i love the argument that an unrelated act (smoking weed in your house or out and about as a pedestrian) should be illegal because an act that is already illegal (driving while intoxicated) should be illegal
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53002 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:20 am to
The problem is that there is no "reliable" test for weed intoxication ("reliable" because the breathalyzer is sketchy at best for alcohol) Plus potheads conceal their crime by using eye drops that bleach their eyes concealing the tell tale signs of intoxication

A concession would be to make eye drops behind the counter and regulated like with cough medicine
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:22 am to





quote:

is the implication that its one vs the other.
========

it is, if one is illegal and one is not


The context was to babyfeetz comment here:


quote:

The responsible use of marijuana causes no harm to society, and should be of no interest to the government in a free society.



Particularly while alcohol is legal to consume (and abuse
)

The responsible use of alcohol also causes no harm to society. The "one vs the other" is the abuse of alcohol and the responsible use of pot.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422503 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:23 am to
the unreasonable use of pot (ie, driving) is already illegal
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:29 am to
quote:

That's simply not true. The real killer is alcohol.


One being true does not negate the other..i.e. because drunk driving (not alcohol itself) kills a lot of people, does not make the case that driving under any other intoxicant doesn't.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:30 am to
Never change, grouchy
This post was edited on 6/24/17 at 9:32 am
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:32 am to
quote:

love the argument that an unrelated act (smoking weed in your house or out and about as a pedestrian) should be illegal because an act that is already illegal (driving while intoxicated) should be illegal


It's such a stupid argument and it is so widely accepted.
Posted by Breesus
House of the Rising Sun
Member since Jan 2010
66982 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:34 am to
I love the guy that wakes up, drinks coffee, puts in a dip, pops a xanex and an Adderall, goes to work, smokes cigs, drinks more coffee, pops another xanex and Adderall around 2, come home, takes an oxycotin, has a few beers, pops and ambien to go to sleep and then wakes up and repeats this process everyday and rails against marijuana legalization.
This post was edited on 6/24/17 at 9:37 am
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:34 am to
quote:

the unreasonable use of pot (ie, driving) is already illegal


As it is with alcohol. What is your point supposed to be, in the context of my reply to babyfeetz?
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:37 am to
quote:

Breesus



You seem to be okay with the "fact" that those of us that use weed are 'psychotic, kid killing, criminals with unconstrained access to eye-drops'



How can you be so cold and uncaring?
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
422503 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:37 am to
bringing up any externality involving driving is stupid

quote:

the argument that an unrelated act (smoking weed in your house or out and about as a pedestrian) should be illegal because an act that is already illegal (driving while intoxicated) should be illegal


that argument is literally retarded
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:37 am to
Seriously? You are going to quote Jimmy Carter as a voice of reason and clear thinking?
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:40 am to
quote:

If that's the case, DUI should be a capital offense, not possession.


I've got no problem with that, either. People that can't help themselves and get drunk then get behind the wheel of a car and kill a family? Ok.

But drugs have been killing people for decades...centuries. Certainly Heroine, cocaine, crack, meth...
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
53002 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:41 am to
quote:

goes to work

The one thing potheads refuse to do
Posted by BlackHelicopterPilot
Top secret lab
Member since Feb 2004
52833 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:42 am to
quote:

The one thing potheads refuse to do







You had me going for a while.

Nice job trolling. You certainly got ME
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Thousands of kids have died over the years from potheads driving around "high".


quote:

That's simply not true. The real killer is alcohol.


Your argument is just because more people are killed by DUI that nobody has been killed from driving high?

I think you are wrong. A LOT of people have died from driving high. Not as many had DUI (from being drunk), but that doesn't support your argument at all.

The point people are making is based upon the quote presented in the OP......by Jimmy Carter, of all people.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
260562 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Does speeding cause a lot of accidents?


More than weed

quote:

Almost everyone speeds by driving over 55 or 65 or 75mph.


And?

quote:

That's just human nature.


So is getting high.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:46 am to
quote:

bringing up any externality involving driving is stupid



How so?


quote:

the argument that an unrelated act (smoking weed in your house or out and about as a pedestrian) should be illegal because an act that is already illegal (driving while intoxicated) should be illegal



that argument is literally retarded




Who is making that argument? Many people have no problem with decriminalization of pot. Making it decriminalized would put it on an even lower priority level that it already is. Legality could created problems that are not needed from such an unimportant issue.
Posted by DawgsLife
Member since Jun 2013
58915 posts
Posted on 6/24/17 at 9:47 am to
quote:

love the argument that an unrelated act (smoking weed in your house or out and about as a pedestrian) should be illegal because an act that is already illegal (driving while intoxicated) should be illegal

quote:

It's such a stupid argument and it is so widely accepted.


Using your logic, shouldn't heroine, cocaine, meth also be legal? I mean, people can use those without getting in a car. Why would you say they should be illegal and other illegals not be legal?
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram