Started By
Message

re: Carnage On Cops A Product of Obama Presidency

Posted on 3/21/17 at 10:44 am to
Posted by LSUwag
Florida man
Member since Jan 2007
17319 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 10:44 am to
Just the other day, I was talking to me neighbor, who is an elderly black man. We were discussing the Markeith Loyd cop killer in Orlando. He justified Loyd shooting the cop because he had a right to be afraid of the police office who was attempting to arrest him. I asked him what about the part where Loyd walked up to the downed police officer and shot her in her face to murdered her. He had no answer and changed the topic.

This was a black on black crime which followed him murdering his black girlfriend three weeks earlier.

My neighbor obviously has the attitude that if you wear a uniform, you are fair game. This neighbor is a retired preacher. I guess decades of Black Liberation Theology have taken a toll on his sense of decency.
This post was edited on 3/21/17 at 10:58 am
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 10:48 am to
quote:

People still defend Zimmerman when the dude is a pathological liar and probable psychopath?


What specific issue are you referring to? Zimmerman needs no defense, as that was done during the trial.
The other part of your post is a strawman, as no one is defending pathological lairs or sociopaths. Aside from that, you haven't established that he, in fact, is a sociopath or a lair.

In your opinion, was Trayvon a victim, a thug, or something else...and what would that be?
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:00 am to
quote:

Carnage On Cops
Is this even a thing? Or is it a porn movie?
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:01 am to
quote:

I guess decades of Black Liberation Theology have taken a toll on his sense of decency.
Or maybe it was the decades of living under state sponsored terrorism due to his skin color?
Posted by PoundFoolish
East Texas
Member since Jul 2016
3724 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:03 am to
quote:

Or maybe it was the decades of living under state sponsored terrorism due to his skin color?


Or it is simply the absolute truth that a certain demographic does not and will not (perhaps cannot?) OBEY. THE. LAW.
This post was edited on 3/21/17 at 11:15 am
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134846 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:07 am to
quote:

Or maybe it was the decades of living under state sponsored terrorism due to his skin color?


Unfortunately, many blacks will do anything to justify their self destructive behavior. That's why every demographic will pass them at mach speed.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:10 am to
quote:

Or maybe it was the decades of living under state sponsored terrorism due to his skin color?


Thats a joke, right?
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:11 am to
quote:

Unfortunately, many blacks will do anything to justify their self destructive behavior.
I'm not arguing that, I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of being perfectly willing to invoke "history" to explain an elderly black guy's views while completely ignoring the likely lived history of his formative years which involved frequent interactions with police as the tip of the spear of the state that was terrorizing people that looked like him.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:12 am to
quote:

Thats a joke, right?
Yeah, Jim Crow was a joke. It never happened. The police have always been right there on the side of the black citizen and not the vicious instruments of state-sponsored terrorism against black folks.
Posted by PoundFoolish
East Texas
Member since Jul 2016
3724 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:12 am to
quote:

I'm not arguing that, I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of being perfectly willing to invoke "history" to explain an elderly black guy's views while completely ignoring the likely lived history of his formative years which involved frequent interactions with police as the tip of the spear of the state that was terrorizing people that looked like him


So heritage, not "skin color," is now a determinant for how a person responds to forensic evidence and eyewitness testimony?
This post was edited on 3/21/17 at 11:18 am
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:14 am to
quote:

So heritage, not "skin color," is now a determinant for forensic evidence and eyewitness testimony?
I have no idea what you are talking about. The other guy said that the guy's stance was perhaps based on the last few decades of "Black Liberation Theology". I'm saying maybe it's based on living through Jim Crow and watching the police terrorize you and your kind on a daily basis.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134846 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:15 am to
quote:

I'm not arguing that, I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy of being perfectly willing to invoke "history" to explain an elderly black guy's views while completely ignoring the likely lived history of his formative years which involved frequent interactions with police as the tip of the spear of the state that was terrorizing people that looked like him.


You said his reasoning for acts committed in the present is sound. That's a justification.
Posted by bmy
Nashville
Member since Oct 2007
48203 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:15 am to
quote:

Aside from that, you haven't established that he, in fact, is a sociopath or a lair.


Is there any doubt? Lack of remorse, antagonistic towards the family after, publicly bragging about killing Trayvon, lying about Trayvon grabbing the gun, criminal history including multiple instances of domestic dispute and violence, etc.

If there was a camera recording im pretty confident Zimmerman would be in jail
This post was edited on 3/21/17 at 11:18 am
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:16 am to
quote:

Yeah, Jim Crow was a joke. It never happened. The police have always been right there on the side of the black citizen and not the vicious instruments of state-sponsored terrorism against black folks.

I mistook the context of your reply. It was directed at the old black mans life experience., and I took it to be a general comment on current police interactions. I stand corrected.
Posted by PoundFoolish
East Texas
Member since Jul 2016
3724 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:17 am to
quote:

I'm saying maybe it's based on living through Jim Crow and watching the police terrorize you and your kind on a daily basis.



But that's NOT what you said before. You referred to "skin" and "color of his skin" as a possible reason for his response to the case.

Even with what you said above, how does a person's history affect their ability to reason through the extrinsic proofs which accurately define and determine truth.?
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:18 am to
quote:

You said his reasoning for acts committed in the present is sound. That's a justification.
No, it's a potential explanation. And really, again, it's just pointing out the hypocrisy of the 1st guy who is happy to appeal to some historical explanation for an indecent mindset - so long as it ignores the much longer and much worse time period prior to the one he identified. Many black folks attitudes toward LEO is self-destructive/counter-productive...that doesn't mean it doesn't have an understandable context.
Posted by Big Scrub TX
Member since Dec 2013
33403 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:19 am to
quote:

But that's NOT what you said before. You referred to "skin" and "color of his skin" as a possible reason for his response to the case.
Not sure what you don't understand about the realities of Jim Crow.
quote:

Even with what you said above, how does a person's history affect their ability to reason through the extrinsic proofs which accurately define and determine truth.?
I dunno. Why not ask the first guy who said it was because the guy lived through decades of Black Liberation Theology.
Posted by upgrayedd
Lifting at Tobin's house
Member since Mar 2013
134846 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Yeah, Jim Crow was a joke. It never happened. The police have always been right there on the side of the black citizen and not the vicious instruments of state-sponsored terrorism against black folks.


50 years from now, when all those that experienced Jim Crow are gone, people will still be invoking that mantra because it has been burned into their brains as something that they say still exists today. In a way, I suppose they're right because we have seen a resurgence in recent years. Oddly enough it has come from minorities who are demanding their own facilities where white people are not allowed.
Posted by Dale51
Member since Oct 2016
32378 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:19 am to
quote:

Lack of remorse, antagonistic towards the family after, publicly bragging about killing Trayvon, lying about Trayvon grabbing the gun, criminal history including multiple instances of domestic dispute and violence, etc.


I don't know if I would feel "remorse" for defending myself against a violent thug....would you?

What are you basing those other claims on? The domestic can be established by police reports, and everyone knows that an angry spouse or girlfriend would never skew the circumstance of any event.
Posted by MrCarton
Paradise Valley, MT
Member since Dec 2009
20231 posts
Posted on 3/21/17 at 11:19 am to
quote:

He's the first black president, and so conservatives are just automatically blaming him for any and all racial tensions that occurred during his presidency. It's not his fault smartphones became ubiquitous over the last 8 years.


SMDH
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram