Started By
Message

re: TOPs will require ACT of 28

Posted on 2/14/16 at 4:52 pm to
Posted by The Pirate King
Pangu
Member since May 2014
57616 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 4:52 pm to
quote:

Why are we getting what is good enough to succeed in college confused with what deserves a scholarship? They aren't the same.


Because it's not a traditional scholarship. It's made to aid students to stay in state for school and as a factor of that as a graduate.

There are plenty of good students that don't make 28's on the ACT and shouldn't be excluded. I know several dickheads that just test well that aced the ACT and bombed out of college after receiving the highest level tops with stipends and all.

College is about how hard you work, not how gifted you are at taking a standardized test.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112553 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 4:55 pm to
quote:

There are plenty of good students that don't make 28's on the ACT and shouldn't be excluded. I know several dickheads that just test well that aced the ACT and bombed out of college after receiving the highest level tops with stipends and all.



these are outliers

the average kid scoring a 28 or above is going to do well in college and likely earn multiple degrees.

kids scoring 22 or less are probably not likely to make it.


i swear the OT needs a lesson on statistics
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
38943 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 4:56 pm to
quote:

that just test well


Please. No such thing.
Posted by Asgard Device
The Daedalus
Member since Apr 2011
11562 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

That's retarded. Should be 23-up


This thread is one giant show of ignorance and irrelevant rambling.

Nobody changed the requirements. If they are short on money they cut everyone out who made a 17. If they're still short then they cut 18. It keeps going until it's solvent.

The budget will fund TOPS and they are NOT changing requirements. That would be very hard to do and very unrealistic, politically speaking. The best they could do is intentionally underfund TOPS up to a target of whatever ACT score they'd like. They can NOT factor GPA into the emergency measures. It's a non-issue in spite of the 100+ commenters in this thread.
Posted by RedMustang
Member since Oct 2011
6851 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 4:57 pm to
quote:

TOPs will require ACT of 28 by chesty
I had a 31 on the ACT and a 2.8 lol I hated HS. I was bored all the time and just didn't care


It sounds like you just didn't care and had a bad attitude. If you were bored, you should have worked harder to get good grades.
Posted by AbitaFan08
Boston, MA
Member since Apr 2008
26538 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:00 pm to
quote:

Because it's not a traditional scholarship. It's made to aid students to stay in state for school and as a factor of that as a graduate.


I've always understood that the purpose of TOPS was to keep Louisianas "best and brightest" from leaving the state. Sorry, but if you are not good at taking a standardized test, then you don't fall into that category.
Posted by fr33manator
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2010
123930 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:03 pm to
quote:

Since we are all created equal though I have no doubt that if they tried to be just as good as black players and were given all of the societal advantages black players are given there is no doubt there would be just as many Asians as blacks playing college basketball


Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:03 pm to
Score a 31 with no prep as a Junior. Salutatorian of a class larger than 200.

#tOT
Posted by rickyh
Positiger Nation
Member since Dec 2003
12454 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:05 pm to
This will never fly without adjustments for minorities. The bell curve or something similar will have to be used. Southern and some of the other small colleges would be shut down.
Posted by Pectus
Internet
Member since Apr 2010
67302 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

You kind of throw around your academia self around here quite often.


Well, I will fully admit I know a lot about 1 thing. And that's it. And I milk it for all it's worth.
Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112553 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:07 pm to
ahhh the OT, where the majority of members scored over 30 on the ACT but decided to attend a run of the mill state school.
Posted by RedMustang
Member since Oct 2011
6851 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:09 pm to
What exactly is the logic behind TOPS? I'm not from Louisiana and had never heard of it until reading about it on TD. Here in Minnesota, kids can have a 4.0 GPA and a 36 ACT and they still don't get any kind of free money from the state. It's nice to help out kids these days, but if money is tight, maybe the program should be abolished? It seems as if much of the south is against free government money. How is TOPS any different? Maybe I'm missing something?
It seems like at a bare minimum, kids should have to get a 3.75 and a 32 to get free tuition. Then again, Minnesota has the highest average ACT score in the nation. Kids here can earn scholarships from colleges, but not from the state. We even had a $1.3 billion dollars state surplus last year.
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28085 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

Minnesota


Isn't the entire state a solid block of ice until June?


Posted by NIH
Member since Aug 2008
112553 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:11 pm to
quote:

4.0 GPA and a 36 ACT and they still don't get any kind of free money from the state.



if you have a 4.0 and 36 you're choosing between harvard, yale, or stanford
Posted by VetteGuy
Member since Feb 2008
28085 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:13 pm to
LINK

All about TOPS...
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421722 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:13 pm to
quote:

What exactly is the logic behind TOPS?

it's a mix of the populism of LA politics and legitimate demographic issues of "brain drain" from the 90s

the problem is the populism part, which required insanely low standards. this also was likely due to federal challenges for discrimination. as you tick that ACT score up, it's going to have an exponential impact on black students
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
84943 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:13 pm to

I did not attend a state run college fwiw.
Posted by yurintroubl
Dallas, Tx.
Member since Apr 2008
30161 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

impact on black students


More of an impact on kids sitting around in school, not students.
Posted by Meatball
Member since Sep 2009
4939 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

the problem is the populism part, which required insanely low standards. this also was likely due to federal challenges for discrimination. as you tick that ACT score up, it's going to have an exponential impact on black students



You hit the nail on the head.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
421722 posts
Posted on 2/14/16 at 5:17 pm to
those students aren't even taking the ACT, dear
Jump to page
Page First 9 10 11 12 13 ... 18
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 11 of 18Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram