Started By
Message

re: Gen. Douglas MacArthur "dug out dug"

Posted on 6/15/15 at 1:41 pm to
Posted by vl100butch
Ridgeland, MS
Member since Sep 2005
34672 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 1:41 pm to
He was a decent WW1 officer...

but by 1941, whole 'nother story...

and what's just as bad, Louis Brereton kept getting pushed up after the cluster at Clark Field...remember he's the guy that said there couldn't be two airdrops on the first day of MARKET GARDEN...
This post was edited on 6/15/15 at 1:41 pm
Posted by RickyDonSkaggs
Member since Sep 2014
1120 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 1:45 pm to

Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
103147 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 1:47 pm to
Very timely post
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 1:48 pm to
agreed
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89602 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 1:57 pm to
quote:

Remember, not only did Washington send MacArthur there, they also dispatched the 1st Marine Div there, which at that time was basically the only ground forces we could muster in the entire theater.


And no worse match between force and mission than to ask Marines to hold ground.

So, you know that's the last act of a desperate Pentagon.

The speed with which Japan seized control of the entire Western and Central Pacific is stunning, even in hindsight - at set up they were on their home islands, Manchuria, and Korea - they also had an army in Eastern China - but within a few weeks, it seemed like there was a Japanese garrison and airfield on every other island in the Pacific at least North of Australia and West of Midway.

And by Summer 1942 - after battles in the Coral Sea and at Midway - it was all over, except the counting for the Empire of Japan.

I want to credit them for following an aggressive and correct strategy - cut the lines of communication between the U.S./U.K. and Australia - and they could have contained the Aussies while focusing on China to the West and the U.S. to the East. But, just as the Confederacy simply didn't have the men and materiel reserves to absorb the losses associated with agggressive, offensive operations, the Japanese could not replace what they were losing - particularly the extraordinarily high losses in capital ships and trained pilots for much of 1942.

Generalship and admiralship counts for only a small part of that war. To put it in perspective - in December 1941 - the U.S. Pacific Fleet consisted of 9 battleships, 3 aircraft carriers, 12 heavy cruisers, 8 light cruisers, 50 destroyers, 33 submarines and 100 patrol bombers (plus the air wings of the 3 aircaft carriers).

By May 1945 - there were 29 carrier DIVISIONS - counting the training squadron and the escorts - just the CVs and CVLs (not counting Saratoga, as she was the flagship of the training squadron) numbered 26 - the majority of which were state of the art, Essex class carriers (the world's first "supercarriers").

The Japanese navy was doing ... not as well ... in May 1945, from a combat power standpoint.
This post was edited on 6/15/15 at 2:00 pm
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64725 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 2:00 pm to
quote:

The Japanese navy was doing ... not as well ... in May 1945, from a combat power standpoint.



Now that's an understatement to say the least.
Posted by LSUinMA
Commerce, Texas
Member since Nov 2008
4777 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 2:39 pm to
Thank you for posting with perspective and accuracy. Now I don't have to do it myself, and can just call the OP a dumbass who can't spell Bataan.
Posted by LR2RedStick
Baton Rouge/Little Rock
Member since Nov 2010
373 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Can we all agree the dugout Doug was a huge piece of shite. A coward and a traitor. I'm watching the pacific on history channel and was reminded of just how big a piece of shite dug out Doug was.
Why in the hell do some people see him as a hero. Abandoning his men on Batan and all the Marines he sacrifice retaking a island that didnt have to be taken. He did it out of pure pride. Sacrificed fathers,brothers and husbands for his pride. Not to mention he put himself in for a MOH for his bull shite heroic actions. 7 silver stars and a arse load more of stolen valor medals. And for some reason he has a monument at his grave site honing his **** arse as some american hero.

P.s. Screw you dug out doug


Look up the Battle of Inchon. Get back to me.
Posted by GarmischTiger
Humboldt County
Member since Mar 2007
6611 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 2:46 pm to
I have a problem with his CMH. It was political cover for his unassing the Philippines under fire.
Posted by LR2RedStick
Baton Rouge/Little Rock
Member since Nov 2010
373 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 2:47 pm to
I will agree that MacArthur was caught with his pants down in the phillipines and should have been on high alert after Pearl Harbor. His actions thereafter and his pure military genius at Inchon and throughout Korea more than made up for it.

He was an arrogant prick. He also used that arrogance and persona to quickly bring japan to heel postwar and rescue half the korean continent from the reign of the dear leaders...aka annihiliation.

Long story short..OP has limited perspective and is basing his entire opinion of a complex historical figure off of an HBO miniseries.
Posted by Amazing Moves
Member since Jan 2014
6048 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 2:54 pm to
How was he a traitor?
Posted by TigerTreyjpg
Monroe, LA
Member since Jun 2008
5815 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 3:02 pm to
quote:

Abandoning his men on Batan


It's generally pretty good strategy to not let officer's in general command get captured. It's always good strategy when them getting captured would be for the sake of pride.

quote:

all the Marines he sacrifice retaking a island that didnt have to be taken. He did it out of pure pride. Sacrificed fathers,brothers and husbands for his pride.


This is another matter entirely, and I agree with you - this was a waste of fine Marines, and he never really answered to anyone for it, simply because he was so popular and powerful, no one would dare cross him/call him out.
Posted by SCwTiger
armpit of 'merica
Member since Aug 2014
5857 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 3:10 pm to
A lot of knowledgeable historians up in here. I enjoy posts like this because it brings so much unknown information to light. Even though many of you have different opinions, you all have much more knowledge of history than myself.
Posted by Feral
Member since Mar 2012
12456 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 3:18 pm to
quote:

He got himself awarded a MoH for the biggest defeat of WWII.



I always thought that was absolutely crazy. He basically got the Medal of Honor for retreating and leaving his men behind.

The worst thing that MacArthur did was to reject the proposed MoH in 1942 for General Jonathan Wainwright -- a man who actually stayed behind, fought and suffered with his men, experienced the horrors of captivity with his men, and looked like a skeleton upon his liberation in 1945.

Posted by asurob1
On the edge of the galaxy
Member since May 2009
26971 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 3:20 pm to
Expecting an imminent attack by the Japanese and armed with the knowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack, prudent actions by those in command in the Philippines should have alleviated the chance of a total surprise attack in the Philippines, and the initiation of proper defensive, if not offensive, operations could possibly have saved the Philippines. However, the failure of General Douglas MacArthur, the commander of United States Army Forces Far East (USAFFE), to initiate these and other actions directly led to the defeat of the American-Filipino forces in the Philippines during the initial phases of the Second World War, causing thousands of American and Filipino military and civilian personnel to suffer through years of brutal captivity at the hands of the Japanese.

In a matter of minutes, like at Hawaii earlier in the day, nearly all of the American combat aircraft stationed at Clark Field, the vast majority of the aircraft then stationed in the Philippines, were caught on the ground parked close to each other and destroyed in the first waves of Japanese air strikes, along with many of the aircraft crewmen. Although the pilots of the few surviving American aircraft made gallant attempts with some effect, the Japanese aircraft greatly outnumbered and out-machined the overwhelmed American pilots, leaving the skies over the Philippine Islands in nearly uncontested control of the Japanese Air Forces.[53] MacArthur's refusal to allow Brereton to attack the Japanese air bases on Formosa directly led to the American-Filipino loss of control of the skies over the Philippines.

Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 3:21 pm to
quote:

He also used that arrogance and persona to quickly bring japan to heel postwar

wasn't he an advocate for letting of the top Japs off easy as war criminals for the supposed sake of post war stability?
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64725 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Look up the Battle of Inchon. Get back to me.




Well you bring up a good point here. MacArthur is just one example of a general that at times looked brilliant and others quite inept. And to be fair he's far from the only general to have both spectacular defeats and failure intermingled with equally spectacular victory and success.

So while it's fair fault his performance at the Philippines in 1941 -42. It should also be pointed out that no matter what he did, the Philippines were going to fall. and after the Philippines his performance was quite good.

As for the matter of him wasting the lives of "good Marines", I'll point out that his favored tactic in WWII, one that he would later use at Inchon, was to instead of attacking the enemy head on in costly frontal attacks against their fortified positions, to by-pass and out flank the enemy using amphibious assaults to get around and behind tier forces. Look at his handling of the New Guinea Campaign and how he repeatedly by-passed strong Japanese forces as he moved ever closer to the Philippines while minimizing his own losses.

And along with this, I'll point out that while MacArthur was using his "hit them where they ain't" strategy to good effect, it was Admiral Nimitz who was at the same time overseeing the Solomon Islands Campaignthat featured some of the bloodiest fighting of the war, including the Battles of Guadalcanal and Bougainville. And keep in mind that following the Solomons Campaign, Nimitz then commanded the Gilbert Islands Campaign that saw the bloody, and very unnecessary, battle of Tarawa.

So while it's fair to criticize MacArthur in many regards, wasting the lives of his men is not one of them. Of the two main allied leaders in the Pacific, Nimitz arguably wasted far more lives than MacArthur.
This post was edited on 6/15/15 at 3:31 pm
Posted by terd ferguson
Darren Wilson Fan Club President
Member since Aug 2007
108775 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 3:29 pm to
quote:

wasn't he an advocate for letting of the top Japs off easy as war criminals for the supposed sake of post war stability?


Yep... as Supreme Commander of occupied Japan.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
73856 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 3:34 pm to
quote:

Yep... as Supreme Commander of occupied Japan.

I'm not a politician and don't know the intricasies of the day and time but those were some barbaric motherfrickers that deserved punishment imo
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
64725 posts
Posted on 6/15/15 at 3:47 pm to
quote:

Expecting an imminent attack by the Japanese and armed with the knowledge of the Pearl Harbor attack, prudent actions by those in command in the Philippines should have alleviated the chance of a total surprise attack in the Philippines, and the initiation of proper defensive, if not offensive, operations could possibly have saved the Philippines. However, the failure of General Douglas MacArthur, the commander of United States Army Forces Far East (USAFFE), to initiate these and other actions directly led to the defeat of the American-Filipino forces in the Philippines during the initial phases of the Second World War, causing thousands of American and Filipino military and civilian personnel to suffer through years of brutal captivity at the hands of the Japanese.

In a matter of minutes, like at Hawaii earlier in the day, nearly all of the American combat aircraft stationed at Clark Field, the vast majority of the aircraft then stationed in the Philippines, were caught on the ground parked close to each other and destroyed in the first waves of Japanese air strikes, along with many of the aircraft crewmen. Although the pilots of the few surviving American aircraft made gallant attempts with some effect, the Japanese aircraft greatly outnumbered and out-machined the overwhelmed American pilots, leaving the skies over the Philippine Islands in nearly uncontested control of the Japanese Air Forces.[53] MacArthur's refusal to allow Brereton to attack the Japanese air bases on Formosa directly led to the American-Filipino loss of control of the skies over the Philippines.


While I pointed out his loss of the air forces at his disposal in the Philippines was perhaps his biggest and most inexcusable failure. Even had he saved all his aircraft from the initial Japanese onslaught, the Philippines were still doomed.

1. The Philippines was totally cut off from any resupply due to the Japanese seizure of the islands of the Central Pacific. This fact alone meant that the fall of the Philippines was only a matter of when, not if. But, like i said, MacArthur's actions in the Philippines did hasten the fall. He could have held out much longer than he did.

2. The air assets available in the Philippines to MacArthur were overmatched. He had basically:
4th Composite Group
and
20th Air Base Group
and
Far East Air Force

The 4th had only two squadrons of fighters. One was equipped with the totally outclassed P-35A's and the other the better P-40. The 20th had no modern aircraft to speak of. Only the FEAF could be said to be a decent formation. but even it had less than 100 modern fighters (P40's) and and handful of modern bombers (B-17's). The rest were obsolete P-35's and even P-26 Peashooter fighters and B-18 & B-10 bombers that were not much more than flying targets for the Japanese Zeros.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram