- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:33 pm to RB10
quote:
The exact opposite of this is true. Dan Campbell even said in his presser that he went through it “to a t” with the officials.
You’re flat out making shite up.
correct
Gene Steratore said usually about two hours before the game, each HC will have a short meeting with the officials and discuss anything unusual or trick plays they might run. There is a white board in the reff dressing room and some HCs will even draw up the formations and plays for the reffs. Campbell discussed this exact play with the reffs AND the TV crew calling the game.
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:33 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
It burnt them because of referee incompetence.
Why not both, if Dallas was informed of 68 then is he uncovered in the end zone?
This post was edited on 1/1/24 at 12:35 pm
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:35 pm to supatigah
quote:
Gene Steratore said usually about two hours before the game, each HC will have a short meeting with the officials and discuss anything unusual or trick plays they might run. There is a white board in the reff dressing room and some HCs will even draw up the formations and plays for the reffs. Campbell discussed this exact play with the reffs AND the TV crew calling the game.
BA wasn’t in that meeting.
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:35 pm to bad93ex
quote:
There is a shite right by the lions huddle before the play where you can hear it plain as day. Also lions coaching staff can inform Goff that 68 is not eligible.
Yes you can barely hear it on the parabolic microphones. You think the players on the field heard it clearly?
You are really quite dumb.
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:35 pm to RB10
And #58 went to the referee to tell him what exactly?
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:36 pm to Kinderman
I want someone on the cowboys to just come out and admit that the retard ref told them the wrong number reported eligible.
This is some low shite by the NFL. Not as bad as the Nola No Call but it’s pushing it
This is some low shite by the NFL. Not as bad as the Nola No Call but it’s pushing it
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:36 pm to bad93ex
quote:
Why not both, if Dallas was informed of 68 then is he uncovered in the end zone.
Maybe, maybe not. Not like we've never seen tackle eligible plays work before though.
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:37 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
Maybe, maybe not. Not like we've never seen tackle eligible plays work before though.
Do they work when the wrong player is called eligible.
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:38 pm to GRTiger
quote:
Since Goff was on the other end of this, I'm ok with it despite the obvious cheating that occurred.
It's the only reason I'm not that outraged, although that ref should be fired for fricking with Vegas' payrolls.
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:39 pm to RB10
I read somewhere this morning that the HEAD REFEREE was not part of the discussion. I’m not sure if that’s 100% true or not just yet.
Also, what a meat head like Campbell thinks is going through it completely may not mean the same thing to everybody else
Also, what a meat head like Campbell thinks is going through it completely may not mean the same thing to everybody else
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:39 pm to bad93ex
quote:
Do they work when the wrong player is called eligible.
No but again that's the ref's fault not the Lions.
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:41 pm to Finkle is Einhorn
quote:
And #58 went to the referee to tell him what exactly?
If 68 goes by himself to the ref and reports then we won’t have this controversy but DC thought he could deceive the defense on who was eligible even though the ref informs the defense and announces over the PA. It’s not that uncommon of a play but the theatrics made it overly complicated.
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:42 pm to saintsfan22
I just wish Detroit would’ve got two more chances to make it after that though
Kind of like I wish the Saints and Brees would’ve got the ball back after the PI penalty against the Rams that year so they would’ve had an opportunity to win the game after they were cheated
Kind of like I wish the Saints and Brees would’ve got the ball back after the PI penalty against the Rams that year so they would’ve had an opportunity to win the game after they were cheated
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:43 pm to bad93ex
quote:
It’s not that uncommon of a play but the theatrics made it overly complicated.
Complicated in the sense that 3 people are in front of you and you can't remember which one talked to you and said "reporting eligible" 5 seconds later.
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:44 pm to saintsfan22
quote:
Complicated in the sense that 3 people are in front of you and you can't remember which one talked to you and said "reporting eligible" 5 seconds later.
Just send 68 next time
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:46 pm to saintsfan22
But didn’t Dan Campbell say in his postgame press conference that the ref told him TWO players can’t mark themselves eligible? Which we know is not true. That’s not the point. But how come Dan doesn’t object to two guys being marked eligible? Meaning he never says well we weren’t asking for two guys to be eligible
But 70 says he didn’t say anything. So… somebody on Detroit is lying about two players being eligible
But 70 says he didn’t say anything. So… somebody on Detroit is lying about two players being eligible
This post was edited on 1/1/24 at 12:47 pm
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:47 pm to Finkle is Einhorn
quote:
And #58 went to the referee to tell him what exactly?
What does it matter? #68 went and reported. #70 didn’t.
Official fricked out and announced that #70 reported.
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:47 pm to Swagga
quote:
Better ban play action and the read option
Yes because play action has never resulted in the qb being sacked and the option as never resulted in a fumble.
When you are entirely reliant on an official for your play that’s a bad play.
Posted on 1/1/24 at 12:47 pm to Finkle is Einhorn
quote:
But 70 says he didn’t say anything. So… somebody on Detroit is lying about two players being eligible
It’s a “he said, she said” situation at this point. BA should’ve been in the pregame coaches meeting and only 68 should’ve approached the ref.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News