- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
supatigah
Favorite team: | New York Mets |
Location: | CEO of the Keith Hernandez Fan Club |
Biography: | Designated pot stirrer and Trent Johnson fan extraordinaire. |
Interests: | |
Occupation: | |
Number of Posts: | 87376 |
Registered on: | 3/18/2004 |
Online Status: | Not Online |
Recent Posts
Message
re: Would someone please explain the crimes Trump committed?
Posted by supatigah on 4/26/24 at 8:53 pm
[quote]Trump had sex with Stormy
-Trump lied about not having sex with Stormy[/quote]
only two people know the truth
one has denied this from the beginning
the other has changed their story more than once ...
re: NASA hears from Voyager 1, the most distant spacecraft from Earth, after months of quiet
Posted by supatigah on 4/26/24 at 3:51 pm
[quote]It takes 22 1/2 hours to send a signal to Voyager 1, more than 15 billion miles (24 billion kilometers) away in interstellar space. [b]The signal travel time is double that for a round trip.[/b][/quote]...
re: Chelsea 2023/24 Season-Long Thread: We’re Toast
Posted by supatigah on 4/26/24 at 12:56 pm
[link=(https://www.reddit.com/r/chelseafc/comments/1ccu6xr/the_man_speaking_on_behalf_of_all_the_fans/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web3x&utm_name=web3xcss&utm_term=1&utm_content=share_button)]I know its reddit, but this is simply awful defense [/link]...
re: STM baseball coach resigns
Posted by supatigah on 4/26/24 at 12:09 am
[quote]
well, I learned something today. But I won't tell anyone you taught it to me.[/quote]
so what else is new?...
re: Chelsea 2023/24 Season-Long Thread: We’re Toast
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 4:57 pm
[quote]Mauricio Pochettino was without star man Cole Palmer through illness, meaning a front three of Noni Madueke, Nicolas Jackson and Mykhailo Mudryk.
There were also changes in defence where Malo Gusto was unavailable. Academy product Alfie Gilchrist starts in his place at right-back, while Be...
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 3:19 pm
[quote]I mean we can start with riots at the Capitol.[/quote]
[link=(https://www.history.com/news/us-capitol-building-violence-fires)]here is a pretty good synopsis of historical violence at the US Capitol building [/link]...
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 3:15 pm
[quote]Ehhhh, that's looking at things (and 230+ years of historical precedent) with a severely distorted prism, if you really believe that.[/quote]
we all know SFP likes to play Law School debate moderator on TD and it is usually hilarious
its hard to know what he believes, sort of like bi...
re: A homeless woman got an apartment. Then came conflicts with neighbors
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 3:12 pm
[embed]https://youtu.be/0SEckEJKDrA?si=m7qPU5eWQeUghNt6[/embed]
Shellenberger on SF is pretty enlightening ...
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 3:00 pm
[quote]They're asking for a super wide immunity that would kill every criminal case at once.[/quote]
which is why I said SCOTUS has to be very careful here
it is far from cut and dried, the merits arguments are sort of invalid to what they are actually ruling on, I agree...
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 2:58 pm
[quote]Your post was in terms of criminal prosecutions. These exist on a state and federal level. It rises its own set of constitutional questions. Like even if this impeachment removes immunity analysis is correct, there's some severe questions about the limitations on that to state police action.[...
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 2:54 pm
I read all of this as a bit of a gambit by trump’s lawyers to force scotus to address a weaponized DOJ in the broader scope
the merits of trump’s case are weak on their substance here, but I dont believe that is the real focus ...
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 2:50 pm
[quote]However, this would not apply to the NY or GA prosecutions.[/quote]
nobody said anything about punitive state actions against a POTUS or former POTUS
damn you are being even beyond your usual stubborness today ...
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 2:48 pm
[quote]Then he likely won't have immunity.
THEN the merits become an issue.
This thread is just about the scope of immunity and the limits of executive action within that analysis.[/quote]
I understand all of that
but SCOTUS has to be very careful here with their ruling and opinion
...
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 2:44 pm
which removal then clears the question of political prosection of a POTUS and opens the door for the criminal justice system to run its course of a citizen no longer in office
otherwise we have the opportunity for political prosecution of a POTUS elected by the people ...
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 2:41 pm
[quote]
We aren't discussing the merits ITT
The question is if that call was part of his executive function or not.[/quote]
there it is
those pesky merits of the accusation
so if jack gets his way then a branch of the executive gets to decide what merit is and their path forward
I do...
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 2:38 pm
[quote]shall be removed from office on impeachment for and conviction of
* treason
* bribery
* or other high crimes and misdemeanors.[/quote]
its right there
other high crimes and misdemeanors...
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 2:35 pm
trump didnt threaten raff, he asked him to do his job
how is that a crime?
I just re-read the transcript and to me it reads like a candidate who felt like he was wronged and asked them to investigate the election
GA disputed Trump’s allegations and said it did investigate and then Trump we...
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 2:28 pm
[quote]Jack wants 4. to come first. If there was a crime Jack needs 2. and 3. to happen before he can act.[/quote]
the impeachment process is meant to protect the POTUS from political trials by having the will of the people and their representation and the will of the states and their senators ha...
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 2:16 pm
we havent seen a DOJ so incredibly misaligned with its own Executive since Nixon
just look at the state of affairs with Nixon’s AG’s
nixon tried to regain control of the DOJ with hilarious unintended consequences for him
trump seemingly let barr do what he wanted
nixon resigned because ...
re: SCOTUS Hears Case - POTUS Trump's lawyer offers no rebuttal.
Posted by supatigah on 4/25/24 at 2:05 pm
[quote]
The tectonic plate shift here is the DOJ wanting case by case authority to control the president rather than a simple blanket rule. Should the supremes endorse then ,, they will have created a new, more than equal branch of govt, that will last for the next hundred years. The DOJ , a bureau...
Popular