Started By
Message

re: Adrian Peterson indicted for child reckless/negligent injury

Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:28 am to
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84784 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:28 am to
quote:

I know and I know I'm in the minority but I still don't think it's all that bad.


You realize those are the front of his thighs?

Also, a reporter who was supposedly involved in the grand jury investigation said there are other pictures that are worse. No link though, heard it on Mad Dog Sports Radio.
Posted by The Cool No 9
70816
Member since Jan 2014
9957 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:33 am to
It's illegal to use a switch on your kids now? How long has this been in effect
Posted by monsterballads
Make LSU Great Again
Member since Jun 2013
29266 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:40 am to
Can you use a switch on an adult?
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66924 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:40 am to
quote:

It's illegal to use a switch on your kids now?


Depends on how you use it.
Posted by jg8623
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2010
13531 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:41 am to
AP did nothing wrong accoring to Texas laws
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
84784 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:46 am to
quote:

It's illegal to use a switch on your kids now? How long has this been in effect




Educate yourself on what Peterson did to his child, and if you still want to support him, you're a horrible person.
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66924 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:47 am to
quote:

AP did nothing wrong accoring to Texas laws



So the grand jury was applying a different state's laws?
Posted by Al Dante
Member since Mar 2013
1859 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:00 pm to
quote:

If he abused a child, he should receive a ban from the NFL. What's hard to understand about that?



I disagree. If he is found to have abused a child by a court then he should serve the punishment and if that means missing games which causes a firing then that's fine. But employers shouldn't get involved in something like this unless it affects their job.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:04 pm to
quote:

But employers shouldn't get involved in something like this unless it affects their job. 


Impacting the public image of your company gets you fired

Hell, people get fired for duis
This post was edited on 9/13/14 at 12:05 pm
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:16 pm to
I think he went overboard and should have done a better job of keeping the kid still. I know my parents used to say something like "you are getting 5 licks, but if you turn around or put your hands back there its gonna be ten." That taught me pretty quick not to turn around. My parents were also good about never spanking me when mad. When I got a spanking, I knew I was being disciplined to correct future behavior, not for my parents to let out their frustration with me.

I think Peterson probably meant to give him a "normal" spanking on his butt but kept going when the kid turned around. He messed up and I think he knows that. I don't think he should be arrested though. I would rather live in a society where all kids get spanked for discipline and a parent occasionally goes too far than in a world where parents are too scared to discipline their kid because they might get arrested and lose their child if they mess up once.

This was a spanking that got too rough. We are not talking about deep bruises and broken bones here. This was not child abuse.
Posted by Al Dante
Member since Mar 2013
1859 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:18 pm to
quote:

Impacting the public image of your company gets you fired

Hell, people get fired for duis


Yeah I understand. My statement was a little too cut and dry. But man, where does it end? Why is Roethlisberger still playing? Should he be banned? If we banned every NFL player that damaged the public image there'd be barely anyone left.
Posted by MaroonMonsoon
Canton
Member since Aug 2014
3875 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:20 pm to
quote:

Monticello


quote:

This was not child abuse.


Right up until you talk about scrotum injury, accident or no.
Posted by RB10
Member since Nov 2010
43811 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

I think Peterson probably meant to give him a "normal" spanking on his butt but kept going when the kid turned around.


If you read the article, Peterson said the injuries on the fronts of his legs came from the switch wrapping around and that he didn't see them until after he was finished. I'm not sure I'm buying that, but it's definitely possible.


quote:

I don't think he should be arrested though. I would rather live in a society where all kids get spanked for discipline and a parent occasionally goes too far than in a world where parents are too scared to discipline their kid because they might get arrested and lose their child if they mess up once.


I agree with you 100% here. I don't think he should go to prison, but I do think his visits should be supervised going forward and that he should be suspended for 6 games at the very minimum.


quote:

This was a spanking that got too rough. We are not talking about deep bruises and broken bones here. This was not child abuse.


It's abuse to me, but not to the extent that some people seem to believe, and not enough to warrant jail time as I said above.
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:23 pm to
quote:

What's "parenting" in the African American community could be "abuse" when MSNBC/TMZ/ESPN gets the pictures.


I hate to mention race in a situation like this but it is totally relevant. What white people call a spanking and what black people call a spanking are often two very different things. I guarantee you Peterson got whippings just as bad or worse as a kid. He's an inexperienced Dad just trying to raise his kid not to be a spoiled brat. I would rather he discipline his kid and go too far a time or two than neglect his kid and let it become just another celebrity brat kid who has never been taught how to act.
Posted by Lsut81
Member since Jun 2005
80124 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:24 pm to
So the thread is still going back and forth between "Kids should be punished accordingly and this was ok" to "This was child abuse, kids shouldn't be hit"?


My 2 cents...

I think kids should be disciplined, no doubt. But I also don't think that discipline should result in scars/bruises, especially days later. The kid was 4 fricking years old, a spanking on his butt that would leave no marks would be just as affective.

I was spanked with a belt growing up, but it was always on the arse and it never left marks. IMO, that is completely acceptable.


For the people that say that Peterson's punishment was appropriate. What if the kid was 2 or 3yrs old, would that change your opinion?
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Right up until you talk about scrotum injury, accident or no.



If you have your pants down and you are getting spanked on the butt and turn around, you can definitely get popped in the balls on accident. It's not like Peterson was thinking "yea you little punk, let me switch you in the balls."
Posted by tigerpimpbot
Chairman of the Pool Board
Member since Nov 2011
66924 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:29 pm to
quote:

If you have your pants down and you are getting spanked on the butt and turn around, you can definitely get popped in the balls on accident. It's not like Peterson was thinking "yea you little punk, let me switch you in the balls."



Well, he's a part time dad who will likely never get to see his kid without supervision, so I hope the little 4 year old learned his lesson.
This post was edited on 9/13/14 at 12:31 pm
Posted by NawlinsTiger9
Where the mongooses roam
Member since Jan 2009
34897 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

This was not child abuse.


Yeah, it's perfectly normal to beat 4 year olds bloody and hit them in their balls with a stick.

fricking ridiculous.
Posted by Monticello
Member since Jul 2010
16197 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:32 pm to
I don't think this spanking was "appropriate" and I don't think anyone else does either. I think he will learn a valuable lesson on how to spank from this. I think he had the right intentions, just not the right methods. My argument is that he doesn't deserve to be arrested, lose his child, or lose his job.
Posted by EWE TIGER
Houma
Member since Sep 2009
924 posts
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:33 pm to
quote:

I would rather he discipline his kid and go too far a time or two


IMO if a parent goes so far as to draw blood on a 4 year old during a whoopin, he should not be hitting his kid at all. A parent should be in control of the situation and have self control while whipping a kid.
Jump to page
Page First 27 28 29 30 31 ... 36
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 29 of 36Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram