- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Adrian Peterson indicted for child reckless/negligent injury
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:28 am to Walt OReilly
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:28 am to Walt OReilly
quote:
I know and I know I'm in the minority but I still don't think it's all that bad.
You realize those are the front of his thighs?
Also, a reporter who was supposedly involved in the grand jury investigation said there are other pictures that are worse. No link though, heard it on Mad Dog Sports Radio.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:33 am to droman225
It's illegal to use a switch on your kids now? How long has this been in effect
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:40 am to The Cool No 9
Can you use a switch on an adult?
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:40 am to The Cool No 9
quote:
It's illegal to use a switch on your kids now?
Depends on how you use it.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:41 am to monsterballads
AP did nothing wrong accoring to Texas laws
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:46 am to The Cool No 9
quote:
It's illegal to use a switch on your kids now? How long has this been in effect
Educate yourself on what Peterson did to his child, and if you still want to support him, you're a horrible person.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 11:47 am to jg8623
quote:
AP did nothing wrong accoring to Texas laws
So the grand jury was applying a different state's laws?
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:00 pm to kywildcatfanone
quote:
If he abused a child, he should receive a ban from the NFL. What's hard to understand about that?
I disagree. If he is found to have abused a child by a court then he should serve the punishment and if that means missing games which causes a firing then that's fine. But employers shouldn't get involved in something like this unless it affects their job.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:04 pm to Al Dante
quote:
But employers shouldn't get involved in something like this unless it affects their job.
Impacting the public image of your company gets you fired
Hell, people get fired for duis
This post was edited on 9/13/14 at 12:05 pm
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:16 pm to abellsujr
I think he went overboard and should have done a better job of keeping the kid still. I know my parents used to say something like "you are getting 5 licks, but if you turn around or put your hands back there its gonna be ten." That taught me pretty quick not to turn around. My parents were also good about never spanking me when mad. When I got a spanking, I knew I was being disciplined to correct future behavior, not for my parents to let out their frustration with me.
I think Peterson probably meant to give him a "normal" spanking on his butt but kept going when the kid turned around. He messed up and I think he knows that. I don't think he should be arrested though. I would rather live in a society where all kids get spanked for discipline and a parent occasionally goes too far than in a world where parents are too scared to discipline their kid because they might get arrested and lose their child if they mess up once.
This was a spanking that got too rough. We are not talking about deep bruises and broken bones here. This was not child abuse.
I think Peterson probably meant to give him a "normal" spanking on his butt but kept going when the kid turned around. He messed up and I think he knows that. I don't think he should be arrested though. I would rather live in a society where all kids get spanked for discipline and a parent occasionally goes too far than in a world where parents are too scared to discipline their kid because they might get arrested and lose their child if they mess up once.
This was a spanking that got too rough. We are not talking about deep bruises and broken bones here. This was not child abuse.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:18 pm to TigerBait1127
quote:
Impacting the public image of your company gets you fired
Hell, people get fired for duis
Yeah I understand. My statement was a little too cut and dry. But man, where does it end? Why is Roethlisberger still playing? Should he be banned? If we banned every NFL player that damaged the public image there'd be barely anyone left.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:20 pm to Monticello
quote:
Monticello
quote:
This was not child abuse.
Right up until you talk about scrotum injury, accident or no.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:21 pm to Monticello
quote:
I think Peterson probably meant to give him a "normal" spanking on his butt but kept going when the kid turned around.
If you read the article, Peterson said the injuries on the fronts of his legs came from the switch wrapping around and that he didn't see them until after he was finished. I'm not sure I'm buying that, but it's definitely possible.
quote:
I don't think he should be arrested though. I would rather live in a society where all kids get spanked for discipline and a parent occasionally goes too far than in a world where parents are too scared to discipline their kid because they might get arrested and lose their child if they mess up once.
I agree with you 100% here. I don't think he should go to prison, but I do think his visits should be supervised going forward and that he should be suspended for 6 games at the very minimum.
quote:
This was a spanking that got too rough. We are not talking about deep bruises and broken bones here. This was not child abuse.
It's abuse to me, but not to the extent that some people seem to believe, and not enough to warrant jail time as I said above.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:23 pm to SirWinston
quote:
What's "parenting" in the African American community could be "abuse" when MSNBC/TMZ/ESPN gets the pictures.
I hate to mention race in a situation like this but it is totally relevant. What white people call a spanking and what black people call a spanking are often two very different things. I guarantee you Peterson got whippings just as bad or worse as a kid. He's an inexperienced Dad just trying to raise his kid not to be a spoiled brat. I would rather he discipline his kid and go too far a time or two than neglect his kid and let it become just another celebrity brat kid who has never been taught how to act.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:24 pm to Monticello
So the thread is still going back and forth between "Kids should be punished accordingly and this was ok" to "This was child abuse, kids shouldn't be hit"?
My 2 cents...
I think kids should be disciplined, no doubt. But I also don't think that discipline should result in scars/bruises, especially days later. The kid was 4 fricking years old, a spanking on his butt that would leave no marks would be just as affective.
I was spanked with a belt growing up, but it was always on the arse and it never left marks. IMO, that is completely acceptable.
For the people that say that Peterson's punishment was appropriate. What if the kid was 2 or 3yrs old, would that change your opinion?
My 2 cents...
I think kids should be disciplined, no doubt. But I also don't think that discipline should result in scars/bruises, especially days later. The kid was 4 fricking years old, a spanking on his butt that would leave no marks would be just as affective.
I was spanked with a belt growing up, but it was always on the arse and it never left marks. IMO, that is completely acceptable.
For the people that say that Peterson's punishment was appropriate. What if the kid was 2 or 3yrs old, would that change your opinion?
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:28 pm to MaroonMonsoon
quote:
Right up until you talk about scrotum injury, accident or no.
If you have your pants down and you are getting spanked on the butt and turn around, you can definitely get popped in the balls on accident. It's not like Peterson was thinking "yea you little punk, let me switch you in the balls."
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:29 pm to Monticello
quote:
If you have your pants down and you are getting spanked on the butt and turn around, you can definitely get popped in the balls on accident. It's not like Peterson was thinking "yea you little punk, let me switch you in the balls."
Well, he's a part time dad who will likely never get to see his kid without supervision, so I hope the little 4 year old learned his lesson.
This post was edited on 9/13/14 at 12:31 pm
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:31 pm to Monticello
quote:
This was not child abuse.
Yeah, it's perfectly normal to beat 4 year olds bloody and hit them in their balls with a stick.
fricking ridiculous.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:32 pm to Lsut81
I don't think this spanking was "appropriate" and I don't think anyone else does either. I think he will learn a valuable lesson on how to spank from this. I think he had the right intentions, just not the right methods. My argument is that he doesn't deserve to be arrested, lose his child, or lose his job.
Posted on 9/13/14 at 12:33 pm to Monticello
quote:
I would rather he discipline his kid and go too far a time or two
IMO if a parent goes so far as to draw blood on a 4 year old during a whoopin, he should not be hitting his kid at all. A parent should be in control of the situation and have self control while whipping a kid.
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News