Started By
Message

re: Dow futures down 500pts

Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:23 am to
Posted by 22jctiger22
Member since Apr 2013
373 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:23 am to
quote:

I’ve fricking had it. I’m losing thousands by the second and social media influencers are traveling the world. I’ve gone mad. Nothing fricking makes any sense anymore.


Stop the bleeding. Sell, Mortimer!
Posted by Jjdoc
Cali
Member since Mar 2016
53531 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:26 am to
quote:

The only issue is that the definition of a recession is based on a lagging indicator therefore you are truly in a recession before you have the confirmation.



Thus the word "lagging".


quote:

The bear market indicator is live though so you aren't in a bear market until you meet the definition.


Nasdaq is in a bear. It's 27% down.


Posted by CP3LSU25
Louisiana
Member since Feb 2009
51150 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:26 am to
quote:

I'm not worried about my 401k. That will recover. I'm worried about my personal stock choices as I fully expect them never to recover. Some of these stocks will go to pennies and then go bankrupt
Posted by FLObserver
Jacksonville
Member since Nov 2005
14516 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:29 am to
quote:

Earnings don't matter in a market like this. I know we haven't hit the levels yet, but we are in a bear market. If your company blows out earnings, your stock will be up 2-3% and then sell off the next day back to even. If you report inline the stock will be down 5% and if you miss you'll be down 10-20%.


Yeah beating earnings is good for about a day and missing or lowing guidance is good for weeks or more now it seems.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58413 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:40 am to
quote:

Some of these stocks will go to pennies and then go bankrupt


Sounds like someone chose some pitiful stocks to invest in.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85467 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:49 am to
I completely understand the lagging difficulty of recession confirmation. I basically expect a recession, but I believe it’s probably a second half 2022 to 2023 problem.

Posted by UltimaParadox
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
40907 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 10:50 am to
quote:

I'm worried about my personal stock choices as I fully expect them never to recover. Some of these stocks will go to pennies and then go bankrupt


Lots of people been gambling last few years. Valuations matter
Posted by NC_Tigah
Carolinas
Member since Sep 2003
124542 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 11:14 am to
quote:

Time to buy on the way down
Maybe so. S&P has a bit to give up yet. Perhaps another 5% to 3800?

We're 50% cash right now. Mostly keeping the powder dry.

Put a toe in today with a few fractional buys though; e.g., MA, EXPE, along with lowering cost-basis in some positions.
Posted by ItzMe1972
Member since Dec 2013
9865 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 11:20 am to
I’ve fricking had it. I’m losing thousands by the second and social media influencers are traveling the world. I’ve gone mad. Nothing fricking makes any sense anymore.
--

Don't have to sell it all. I'm selling some.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
15193 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 11:24 am to
I bought some TTD earlier at $45.33 for a hopeful quick trade. This was bought in my frick around find out play account.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11279 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 11:24 am to
quote:

Lots of people been gambling last few years. Valuations matter


Valuations do not matter when 90% of the capital flows into equities are price insensitive.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85467 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 11:25 am to
quote:

S&P is almost to it.. It's down 101 today. Another day like today reaches 20% Split hairs all you want.


We’ll if getting close is all that matters, Trump presided over 2 bear markets.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
15193 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 11:27 am to
quote:

Valuations do not matter when 90% of the capital flows into equities are price insensitive.


Do you mean like employer sponsored retirement plans and funds with mandates?
This post was edited on 5/9/22 at 11:32 am
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11279 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 11:30 am to
You’re over the radar, baw

ETA: how many of you look at financial statements and metrics to make investment decisions and how much of your total portfolio is discretionary?
This post was edited on 5/9/22 at 11:32 am
Posted by UltimaParadox
Huntsville
Member since Nov 2008
40907 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Do you mean like employer sponsored retirement plans?


I am assuming he means that the majority of money entering the market is through passive index funds. Which I believe is around 50% of money held in funds.

The performance of the NASDAQ vs the S&P and Dow shows that people are exiting the more risky positions first.
Posted by TDTOM
Member since Jan 2021
15193 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 11:35 am to
Maybe, but most funds are inefficient by design.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11279 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 11:38 am to
I think it’s higher than 50 and it’s putting active funds out of business. We’re basically at an inflection point where it will go to 100% passive and then to $0 without a massive regulatory change. It’s happened a few times before and always happens when stock market returns become a symbol of national pride.
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85467 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 11:39 am to
quote:

am assuming he means that the majority of money entering the market is through passive index funds.


Passive or active is not really as big a deal for his take - both approaches are bound by prospectus to invest money. An active equity fund isn’t going to sit on 50% cash.

Ultimately his belief is basically that the market is a Ponzi scheme.
Posted by wutangfinancial
Treasure Valley
Member since Sep 2015
11279 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 11:40 am to
So your take is that it’s a discounting mechanism for cash flows?

I’ve never once called it a ponzi
This post was edited on 5/9/22 at 11:41 am
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
85467 posts
Posted on 5/9/22 at 11:43 am to
quote:

We’re basically at an inflection point where it will go to 100% passive and then to $0 without a massive regulatory change.


I am of the belief active could/should outperform as passive gets more popular. The predictability that passive beings should swing the pendulum back to active. If there is no longer a random walk, active should take advantage.
first pageprev pagePage 4 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram