- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lee vs. Mett - Question based on assumptions
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:06 pm to TexasTiger82
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:06 pm to TexasTiger82
You would be correct, sir
1
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:07 pm to RileyTime
quote:
RileyTime
just checking! 
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:08 pm to TexasTiger82
Yet another new thread about yet another hypothetical scenario involving LSU QBs that popped into yet another rantard's head.
Let's see how many more threads we can start today about hypothetical scenarios involving Lee and Mett.
The Rant is full of awesome today.
Let's see how many more threads we can start today about hypothetical scenarios involving Lee and Mett.
The Rant is full of awesome today.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:09 pm to chalupa
quote:
Did you not see the other 3-5 threads on QB in the first 2 pages of the rant?
No.
We must start 3-5 more new threads about LSU QBs every hour on the hour.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:11 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:
experience is nice as a concept, but it's not a virtue in and of itself. remember, jeff george has a lot of nfl experience.
in your OP you said two QBs who are as good as eachohter.
stop this oh there is this guy who sucks but has more experience so you must start him.
Its common sense that if you have two guys with equal skill you start the one with more experience, because he knows how to better play in the system then the guy who has never played in that system.
Lets say in the NFL that Cam Netwon and Mike Vick are both equal in skill a very good possibility. Who is the Better QB, easy mike vick why because he has more experience in the NFL he knows the game speed, something that has nothing to do with skill, he knows defenses better then the other guy nothing to do with skill, and so on and so forth.
if lee and mett are equal in skill lee should get the start because he has more experience.
Plus the goal of a football team is to win as many games as possible this season, why would you put that in jeopardy by building a QB for the next season?
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:13 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
catholictigerfan
excellent excellent excellent explanation
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:15 pm to TexasTiger82
great.....another qb post........please post something original
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:19 pm to TexasTiger82
I almost changed my answer to 8 haha
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:27 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:
that both of them finish the season with 2000 yards, 14 TDS and 10 INTs,
Same stats does not equal same production or outcome.
You're question is intentionally vague, either to condition responses or in an effort to not condition responses.
If the premise is both quarterbacks operating in parallel seasons where their execution, as you put it in the op, is equal in all facets of the game, then you play Mett because he gains the most in experience. If the premise is merely that stats are equal, then you play Lee for the experience he already has.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:29 pm to TexasTiger82
Why would you do that?
Is it to gain experience?
So is experience important, or not?
Is it to gain experience?
So is experience important, or not?
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:32 pm to Bayoufightingtiger
quote:
You play the guy coming back next year. Why in the hell would you not play the QB who will be the starter next year? Going into next year, Mett would have more experience versus anyone returning.
You might not realize it but there's a very remote possibility that we could win a NC this year.
Next year will still be there. At least most of it will.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:33 pm to jmath23lsu
quote:Exactly, what about fumbles? Checking to the wrong play? Motivating other players to keep their head up through adversity? All things that experience plays a huge role in.
Same stats does not equal same production or outcome.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:36 pm to SportTiger1
Man yall just don't understand.
Lee throws off of his........his.....his...
his "back foot" dan dan daaaaaan.
After that experience means nothing.
Lee throws off of his........his.....his...
his "back foot" dan dan daaaaaan.
After that experience means nothing.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 5:43 pm to upgrade
last season in clutch situations(Tenn., FL., Ala.) Lee came through.... he has the respect of the team and coaches(some of the fans), why some folk just wont let the situation play itself out is beyond me.... I feel like I am part of the problem by even replying........ just hoping to add some balance to this rantardic thread..
Posted on 9/14/11 at 8:58 pm to lake chuck fan
Tired of reading about the little experience Lee has that put him ahead of Mett. Mett has in my opinion way more experience af QB and I don't care if it was against JUCO talent. Obviously he knows how to motivate and command the troops on the field. Most on here who favor Lee are the same ones happy JJ is not on the team. These are the same people who called for JJ's head and stuck their heads in the sand when Lee screwed up numerous times and could of easily lost to LA Tech. Whether you like it or not, Mett is the better QB hands down and needs to play now. Experience means zero when the experience you have is mostly negative. According to the idiot post on this topic, myself and only a few others will bs pulling for Mett during his career here. LSU has recruited this kid very hard and the coaches on this team know he will be called upon very soon to lead this team.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 9:01 pm to TexasTiger82
This thing is getting old. Can we ban this topic? Thanks
Posted on 9/14/11 at 9:11 pm to Bayoufightingtiger
quote:You can't say it's your opinion when it's a fact that Lee has more QB experience, especially against SEC opponents.
Mett has in my opinion way more experience af QB and I don't care if it was against JUCO talent.
quote:There's a reason why he's not playing now. It's pretty obvious.
Whether you like it or not, Mett is the better QB hands down and needs to play now.
quote:The experience he earned last year was pretty fricking good. People harp on his freshman year way too much.
Experience means zero when the experience you have is mostly negative.
quote:This is just retarded.
According to the idiot post on this topic, myself and only a few others will bs pulling for Mett during his career here.
You, sir, are an idiot.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 9:13 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:
If you assume(a) Lee's and Mett's playbooks are identical, and (b) their execution over the course of the season will be identical... why wouldn't you prefer to play the QB who has 2+ years of eligibility left versus the QB with less than one?
Are we also "assuming" that Mett has the same (or better) ability to read SEC defenses at NCAA Division I gamespeed as Lee does?
Posted on 9/14/11 at 9:14 pm to TexasTiger82
what an original post ive never seen one like this
Posted on 9/14/11 at 9:16 pm to tigahbait62
Can't wait for the Rivers vs. Randall debate to start in 3 years.
Page 3 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News