- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Lee vs. Mett - Question based on assumptions
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:41 pm
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:41 pm
If you assume(a) Lee's and Mett's playbooks are identical, and (b) their execution over the course of the season will be identical... why wouldn't you prefer to play the QB who has 2+ years of eligibility left versus the QB with less than one?
NOTE: I pose the question only to hear folk's opinions. Barring injury, I am sure Lee will be the QB for the rest of the year whether everyone likes it or not.
NOTE: I pose the question only to hear folk's opinions. Barring injury, I am sure Lee will be the QB for the rest of the year whether everyone likes it or not.
23
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:43 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:
If you assume(a) Lee's and Mett's playbooks are identical, and (b) their execution over the course of the season will be identical
a, i don't think they are.
b, i don't think they will.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:43 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:
If you assume(a) Lee's and Mett's playbooks are identical, and (b) their execution over the course of the season will be identical... why wouldn't you prefer to play the QB who has 2+ years of eligibility left versus the QB with less than one?
because the one who has been here for 4 years has more experience then the one who is just starting here.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:44 pm to TexasTiger82
Since we can go 10-2 just running the ball, I would play the guy coming back next year. Actually helps out for recruiting when recruits know the starting QB is returning.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:44 pm to TexasTiger82
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:44 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:
If you assume(a) Lee's and Mett's playbooks are identical, and (b) their execution over the course of the season will be identical..
If their execution would be identical, there would be no reason to have a debate.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:45 pm to catholictigerfan
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:46 pm to Wideman
quote:
If their execution would be identical, there would be no reason to have a debate
One will be back next year with experience and one will not.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:46 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:
why wouldn't you prefer to play the QB who has 2+ years of eligibility left versus the QB with less than one?
So what you're saying is a senior qb should never start over a junior, and the starter should be based on how many years they have to play.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:46 pm to catholictigerfan
quote:
more experience
I get that. So even if you could know that both of them finish the season with 2000 yards, 14 TDS and 10 INTs, the experience of Lee gets the edge?
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:47 pm to TexasTiger82
How many more ways can we word this Lee vs. Mett debate? NOTE: I pose the question only to hear folk's opinions.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:47 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:
I get that. So even if you could know that both of them finish the season with 2000 yards, 14 TDS and 10 INTs, the experience of Lee gets the edge?
yes
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:47 pm to TexasTiger82
Lee has more game experience, has been through a gauntlet during his time at LSU and stuck it all out like a champ! He has earned his starts
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:48 pm to JOJO Hammer
quote:
So what you're saying is a senior qb should never start over a junior, and the starter should be based on how many years they have to play.
No, I'm just asking if everything else is equal, who do you play.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:48 pm to Bayoufightingtiger
quote:
Actually helps out for recruiting when recruits know the starting QB is returning.
Unless you are a QB recruit and then you know you have no chance of playing.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:48 pm to TIGEREYE1
quote:
TIGEREYE1
quote:
28 posts
noob
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:49 pm to liquid rabbit
quote:
How many more ways can we word this Lee vs. Mett debate?
A lot. Isn't that the point of boards like this, to debate this kind of stuff?
If you're tired of the debate, which I understand, don't click on the threads.
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:51 pm to TexasTiger82
You play the guy coming back next year. Why in the hell would you not play the QB who will be the starter next year? Going into next year, Mett would have more experience versus anyone returning.
This post was edited on 9/14/11 at 4:52 pm
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:52 pm to TexasTiger82
quote:Absurd assumption.
Lee's and Mett's playbooks are identical,
quote:Equally absurd assumption.
their execution over the course of the season will be identical
Posted on 9/14/11 at 4:52 pm to mylsuhat
quote:
mylsuhat
quote:
He has earned his starts
i hear people saying that a lot and it's a valid argument. i don't agree, but it's fair.
Page 1 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News