Started By
Message

re: Does our style of "pro style" offense hinder our passing game?

Posted on 11/12/14 at 9:50 pm to
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16035 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 9:50 pm to
quote:

JMHO and sorry for the long winded response.


well you add something thought out to the thread, and aren't a bone head, so long winded or not it was a good post
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67590 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

They say it is the route trees and QB reads that make it pro style and has nothing to do with formations or play calling.


We have an ex pro OC...that is why they think it's a pro style offense. I don't watch coach films of the games to truly know the route trees we run but I am pretty sure Blackledge said we ran a simple route scheme. I would think he would say that after watching the coaches films since it's almost impossible to get an understanding of the routes watching the games as shown on tv.
Posted by Mr. Hangover
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2003
34508 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 9:54 pm to
quote:

Are Mark Ingram and Pierre Thomas smaller shiftier backs



I would venture to say that Ingram runs the ball out of single back sets or I-formation 80% of the time even though the saints pass more than they run (they have been WAY more balanced in the past 3-4 weeks) so I'm not too sure what you're getting at..

LF is leading the SEC in all purpose yards as a true freshman so I don't think our formations or lack of spread formations are the problem
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67590 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:00 pm to
Good response. My question is this though. We always hear about qbs reading defenses and all but with all the checking back with the sideline for checks and what not wouldn't you think they would also be identifying which receiver is the primary wr?

Also we do simplify a lot of our passes with max protect 1-2 wr routes.

I think the only way they can improve the passing game and QB development is to work on passing against the rent a wins.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16035 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:01 pm to
I guess Yeldon and Derick Henry are "smaller shiftier backs" because that's the kind of offense Bama runs now. A lot of shotgun and a lot of passing and very little I formation pound it up the middle. I guess Bama is going to start recruiting small shiftier backs who can't run downhill. I'm not saying we should run a Bama type offense, we still need our own identity which is more run based.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18963 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:03 pm to
quote:

They say it is the route trees and QB reads that make it pro style and has nothing to do with formations or play calling.


It's because of the presnap reads both the receivers & QB have to make at the line of scrimmage. The receivers have to adjust their routes depending on the defensive coverage. The QB has to see the same thing. Then communication with simple hand gestures before the snap of the ball becomes key as the receivers & QB have to see the same thing & be on the same page. As for the routes, there are times where the QB is throwing to spot other times it's on timing. If a receiver doesn't get to the spot on time or doesn't the get the proper depth on the route, it can ruin the entire play. In instances like that, the QB will get looked at for making a bad read or poor throw but the failure of the play really goes on the receiver. It just takes time for this all to come together sometimes.

Is that good enough for you Topwater Dumbass?
This post was edited on 11/12/14 at 10:23 pm
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18963 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:07 pm to
Are you serious? Alabama runs a shite load of I formation & pro set mixed in with shotgun. That's typical pro style offense. I formation in itself isn't what is considered pro style. Pro style consist of I formation, pro set & shotgun. NFL teams are even sprinkling in pistol over the last several years.
Posted by trooploop
Member since Feb 2013
831 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:08 pm to
During last year's bowl game Jon Gruden talked about the complex NFL passing game that LSU was running and how far ahead the LSU receivers will be. Hard to argue with this success of Landry and OBJ.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16035 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:09 pm to
What SEC teams would you consider to not run 'pro style' offenses?
Posted by Cracking
Northshore
Member since Aug 2006
3431 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:11 pm to
quote:

Also we do simplify a lot of our passes with max protect 1-2 wr routes.


When I say 2 reads, I don't mean only 2 WR routes, but only ask the QB to read the defense and choose between 2 WRs with however many WRs in the formation/running routes.

quote:

I think the only way they can improve the passing game and QB development is to work on passing against the rent a wins.


The QBs definitely need more reps in the passing game to improve. Whether against rent-a-wins or in practice, it looks like they are so limited with reading coverages that finding the "right" option is difficult. The passing game looks forced rather than comfortable.

I've debated myself on whether it's the preparation or the talent, but what it seems to me is the philosophy of executing the play as designed without mistakes. It looks like the QBs are pressing and uncomfortable.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67590 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:18 pm to
Doesn't seem like the best way to complement a great running game. All we need is to be able to make defenses respect our passing and we would be so much better off.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18963 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:19 pm to
Texas A&M, Missouri & Auburn are probably the furthest from pro style offenses in the SEC right now. A&M runs an air raid spread while Auburn is uptempo ground attack oriented. Auburn can hit you with power or get to the edges.

There's also a large number of schools that use a blend of spread & pro style but the schools who are strictly pro style are LSU, Alabama, Tennessee, Arkansas & Georgia.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67590 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:23 pm to
quote:

I've debated myself on whether it's the preparation or the talent, but what it seems to me is the philosophy of executing the play as designed without mistakes. It looks like the QBs are pressing and uncomfortable.


I really think it's all about reps.

We run left all night long and the ball is always on the left hash. From what I have seen AJ is good rolling out to his right...it limits the reads and gives him the run/pass option. We do not cater to his strengths.
Posted by BigBrod81
Houma
Member since Sep 2010
18963 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:26 pm to
quote:

From what I have seen AJ is good rolling out to his right...it limits the reads and gives him the run/pass option. We do not cater to his strengths.


You can only roll a QB out so many times per game & be successful with it before you CBs jumping your underneath routes. Plus it shrinks the field which can lead to more interceptions.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35398 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:29 pm to
quote:

I still think we could absolutely kill teams running a power oriented version of Oregons offense.
All of our running backs have very good to excellent speed and Fournette would excel in open space. If we sped up the offense we could probably tire out most defenses with our depth. They would still get punished physically trying to tackle our athletes.

Wish we would stop spending the entire play clock trying to call the perfect play and instead just line up and go.
Posted by AlwysATgr
Member since Apr 2008
16441 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:29 pm to
Our approach is the anti-rhythm for QB's. Every pass attempt seems more like an "event" than a routine part of the game plan. Like a 55 yd FG attempt than an extra point.

FTR, I've heard Risher remark that our route trees were simple.

Finally, it's almost incredulous that we can be that wrong for so long on so many QB recruits - if our passing woes are really a talent issue.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16035 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:30 pm to
would you say the Saints and Denver (along with most of the rest of the NFL )run pro style offenses?
This post was edited on 11/12/14 at 10:30 pm
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
35398 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:31 pm to
quote:

During last year's bowl game Jon Gruden talked about the complex NFL passing game that LSU was running and how far ahead the LSU receivers will be. Hard to argue with this success of Landry and OBJ.
OBJ and Landry would be NFL receivers if LSU had the simplest offense in the world.
Posted by Topwater Trout
Red Stick
Member since Oct 2010
67590 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:35 pm to
quote:

You can only roll a QB out so many times per game & be successful with it before you CBs jumping your underneath routes. Plus it shrinks the field which can lead to more interceptions.


I'm not saying run it all night. I'm saying he looks comfortable rolling to his right.

I really don't see him making that many bad reads anyway. The problems seem to be more with a lack of reps and timing. Lacks confidence.
Posted by boxcar willie
kenner
Member since Mar 2011
16035 posts
Posted on 11/12/14 at 10:40 pm to
quote:

Finally, it's almost incredulous that we can be that wrong for so long on so many QB recruits - if our passing woes are really a talent issue.



it's not a talent issue. All these guys would look like pretty good QB's and recievers on pretty much any other teams in the country. Like you said, every pass attempt is an 'event' rather than a routine part of the game plan. We just need to run an offense more like what the rest of college and the pros run, whether you want to call it 'pro style' or what ever. If the "pre snap reads and hand signals and sideline hand reads and route trees" are so complex and pro oriented and take years to learn then we need to do what the other college teams do. WE have 3 -4 years to work with these guys and it's not a full time year round job for them like it is in the pros. They still have academics and other shite to take care of.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram