- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Charles Scott likely to start the opener at TB
Posted on 8/23/08 at 12:40 pm to Derby Tigah
Posted on 8/23/08 at 12:40 pm to Derby Tigah
quote:
Miles belief is you practice how you play
and so far keiland has proved him wrong. your point?
Posted on 8/23/08 at 12:42 pm to horndog
quote:
This Guilbeau's way of calling SFP out*
quote:
*SFP wishes
you think i care about glenn fricking gilbeau?
he can keep his $30k/year job as the LSU-approved hack
Posted on 8/23/08 at 12:42 pm to horndog
quote:
Heres to watching CS knock people's heads off this season.
question for you and everyone else
what do you prefer?
a. back who "knocks people heads off"
b. back who makes people miss for more yards
Posted on 8/23/08 at 12:51 pm to Lester Earl
i've never been opposed to CS being the starter, if he's the better back
KW and CS were both better than hester last year
KW and CS were both better than hester last year
Posted on 8/23/08 at 3:04 pm to SlowFlowPro
CramItUgly has no clue. KW and CS better than Hester? Did you watch last year's games? No doubt CS will start and KW will get his carries. Still TB by committee unless a major injury. Porter wants, not likes, slam-mouth football and wants his backs, not likes his backs, to run over people. You will see a lot of inside running with CS and Ridley. No doubt Murphy and KW will get the outside opened up and have some big runs.
Posted on 8/23/08 at 3:16 pm to HITMAN202
Ed Scott doesnt even like U!!!!!!
Posted on 8/23/08 at 3:24 pm to HITMAN202
quote:
KW and CS better than Hester? Did you watch last year's games?
did you?
Posted on 8/23/08 at 3:28 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
i've never been opposed to CS being the starter, if he's the better back
KW and CS were both better than hester last year
Posted on 8/23/08 at 3:32 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
KW and CS were both better than hester last year
i think a lot of people on this board are so accustomed to hester and lsu's lack of a running game prior to him that they've forgotten what a dominant ground game with explosive backs looks like. i think KW and CS remind them this year
Posted on 8/23/08 at 3:57 pm to TulaneTigerFan
Explosive running game?? That is not what wins football games. Porter, the RB coach wants blue-collar TBs. Doesn't matter who you all think is the best. Miles and Crowton will use their best (not your best ) and in spite of you all, may win another BCS. Explosive running game??? No clue. The coaches have set plays for each TB. They are starting to have some two TB sets (like Arkansas did last year.)
Posted on 8/23/08 at 4:02 pm to HITMAN202
you really like question marks don't you???
Posted on 8/23/08 at 4:09 pm to TulaneTigerFan
quote:
lsu's lack of a running game prior to him (hester)
There was a lack of running game before him? I thought we won in 03 due to the running game.
Posted on 8/23/08 at 4:11 pm to Archie Bengal Bunker
quote:
There was a lack of running game before him? I thought we won in 03 due to the running game.
05 when addai was out and the majority of 06 before KW emerged as the starter.
This post was edited on 8/23/08 at 4:12 pm
Posted on 8/23/08 at 4:11 pm to Archie Bengal Bunker
quote:Addai had a good year as well. 2 years later.
There was a lack of running game before him? I thought we won in 03 due to the running game.
Posted on 8/23/08 at 4:15 pm to TulaneTigerFan
I guess??? What do you think??? Its a way to point out another's lack of reasoning (or my own..) The whole issue of a running game is ball control and game control and wearing down a defense. These defenses that are hammered for 3-4-5 yards a pop, get scored on, and their offenses are kept off the field, just can't do flip and their coaches game plan gets flushed down the toilet. That's what wins BCS titles.
Posted on 8/23/08 at 4:20 pm to Archie Bengal Bunker
quote:
There was a lack of running game before him? I thought we won in 03 due to the running game.
and which back in 03 was similar to hester? none! *gasp*...well then how could we possibly have won anything hitman???
This post was edited on 8/23/08 at 4:21 pm
Posted on 8/23/08 at 4:21 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
you think i care about glenn fricking gilbeau?
Face it, Guilbeau pawned you indirectly multiple times in that article.
quote:
CS had a higher YPC
Then Lester pawned you right after.
This post was edited on 8/23/08 at 4:23 pm
Posted on 8/23/08 at 4:25 pm to dranknpurple
I wasn't particularly impressed by Scott last year. Other than one long rumble against Kentucky, I don't recall him making any particularly momentous runs. I remember that he made a couple of nice gains on inside slip screens, but not runs out of the backfield.
I primarily remember him getting stuffed on 4th and 1 at Kentucky.
I am not saying he is a poor back, by any stretch of the imagination. However, did he really impact games more than Keiland last year?
I primarily remember him getting stuffed on 4th and 1 at Kentucky.
I am not saying he is a poor back, by any stretch of the imagination. However, did he really impact games more than Keiland last year?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News