Started By
Message

re: Grits in gumbo instead of rice?

Posted on 2/20/15 at 5:09 pm to
Posted by theantiquetiger
Paid Premium Member Plus
Member since Feb 2005
19285 posts
Posted on 2/20/15 at 5:09 pm to
quote:

TH03


TH03, you are the biggest fricking troll and moron on this board.

I never did claim the scotch aged for 60+ more years, I just stated that it probably changed quite a bit in 60 years (and this was told to me by some experts more knowledgeable than you).

As for the grits, about 1/2 the people that replied said they would try it and one said he has seen it before at a restaurant.

So, shut the frick up!!!
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
81225 posts
Posted on 2/20/15 at 5:15 pm to
I don't think I could do a scoop of grits into a big bowl of gumbo, but I think ladling a little bit of thick gumbo atop some grits would be tasty.
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171045 posts
Posted on 2/20/15 at 5:16 pm to
quote:

I just stated that it probably changed quite a bit in 60 years (and this was told to me by some experts more knowledgeable than you).



except it doesn't. so those people were wrong. do some research on it before you start a thread bragging about something that's wrong.

quote:

As for the grits, about 1/2 the people that replied said they would try it and one said he has seen it before at a restaurant.


groups of people agreeing means it's not a bad idea? someone please let "face tattoos anonymous" know this.
Posted by hungryone
river parishes
Member since Sep 2010
11987 posts
Posted on 2/20/15 at 6:01 pm to
I'm not climbing aboard the grits in gumbo train, but a slice of hogshead cheese melted over a bowl of hot grits is a damn fine thing.
Posted by C-Bear
A Texas Tiger
Member since May 2005
811 posts
Posted on 2/20/15 at 6:08 pm to
I've personally never tried it, but there is a Cajun restaurant near our house that offers gumbo over jalapeño cheese grits with a poached egg on top for breakfast.
Posted by theantiquetiger
Paid Premium Member Plus
Member since Feb 2005
19285 posts
Posted on 2/20/15 at 6:18 pm to
quote:

except it doesn't. so those people were wrong. do some research on it before you start a thread bragging about something that's wrong.



Once again trolling.

I searched and on the first thing that popped up:

quote:

Changing vs. Ageing There are people who admit changes taking place in bottled whisky, but they refuse to call it ageing or maturation because these terms were legally restricted to the period the whisky rests casked in the warehouse. Let’s see what the 1990 Scotch Whisky Order has to say about that (Section 3 c): “Scotch whisky” […] means whisky which has been matured in an excise warehouse in Scotland in oak casks of a capacity not exceeding 700 litres, the period of that maturation being not less than 3 years. This is the only mention of maturation in the order, the 1988 Scotch Whisky Act say the same in a slightly diferent wording. And the term “ageing” is not mentioned in either of the documents, so I think it is fair to indeed use the term “bottle ageing” for the things that happen in a whisky bottle.


LINK
Posted by tke_swamprat
Houma, LA
Member since Aug 2004
9793 posts
Posted on 2/20/15 at 6:22 pm to
Grits....nah

Now quinoa would better
Posted by Tigertown in ATL
Georgia foothills
Member since Sep 2009
29206 posts
Posted on 2/20/15 at 6:26 pm to
I'd eat it fer sure.
Posted by Rohan2Reed
Member since Nov 2003
75674 posts
Posted on 2/20/15 at 6:29 pm to
quote:

a slice of hogshead cheese melted over a bowl of hot grits is a damn fine thing.


Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171045 posts
Posted on 2/20/15 at 6:36 pm to
quote:

Unlike wine, whisky does not mature in the bottle. So even if you keep a 12 year old bottle for 100 years, it will always remain a 12 year old whisky. As long as the bottle is kept out of direct sunlight, the Scotch Whisky will neither improve nor deteriorate, even if it is opened. Whisky that is stored at very low temperatures can become cloudy, but the cloudiness should disappear when the whisky is returned to room temperature.


LINK
Posted by 911Moto
Member since Sep 2013
5491 posts
Posted on 2/20/15 at 9:09 pm to
I have a friend who does gumbo with grits. I've gone to a couple parties where he's had it. The first time I was like, "WTF? Where's the rice?" I do not eat grits. Ever. But I gave it a try and it was actually pretty good. Of course, I still prefer rice - but had it again around Christmas at his house, and it was even better now that I was expecting it. I have no clue what the normal consistency of grits is supposed to be or whether his grits were any good as grits go, but the combo worked for me. And his gumbo is one of those very watery, light types - not a nice thick dark roux (though it still tasted very good). But the combo still held up well.
Posted by Gaston
Dirty Coast
Member since Aug 2008
39054 posts
Posted on 2/20/15 at 11:17 pm to
I think if you dried the grits, like a grit cake, then sent it through a french fry potato slicer and let it set up a bit after you'd be golden.
Posted by samson'sseed
Augusta
Member since Aug 2013
2070 posts
Posted on 2/21/15 at 10:06 am to
I'd only use grits in gumbo, if there was no rice. But it would work.

It's a slightly inferior substitute.

Contrary to how most of these poor-mannered morons responded, early Cajuns probably used grits, hominy, or cornmeal mush more often than rice. Corn was easier to grow and more common than rice in upstate La. about 100-150 years ago. Rice was a luxury.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram