re: Philosophy: Do you believe in a deterministic or indeterministic universe?

quote:

---

Right, that's why I (and many others) call it an illusion.

---

see this is where I have issue with this type of thought process. Maybe you are correct, maybe our free will is an illusion. But it is hard to say that what I experience isn't really the way it happens.

Pretty much you are saying, I experience myself doing X but X is really an illusion of Y and X isn't really true.

quote:

---

That is the beauty of our consciousness, in my opinion. For instance, your brain makes your vision appear to give you the full scope of your present environment. That is also an illusion, as we know your eyes have blind spots and your brain is filling in the gap. There are plenty of studies like the one I referenced earlier, but we don't quite have the technology to completely rule out free will... yet.

---

but you talk as we don't have free will, but we don't have enough evidence to prove other wise.

Ok sure the brain fills in the gap, but this is more than just the brain filling in blind spots in our vision. But my experience shows me that I have free will. Just like I experience myself touching things, it is hot, or cold. My experience shows me one thing, and you are saying it isn't really that way.

I don't think your answer proved we don't have free will. All it proves that our brain makes an illusion that we see everything. It doesn't give us the illusion that we see something when we really don't see something. That is what you are claiming. I experience that most of my actions are free, but that is just an illusion there are a fair amount of things I don't have freedom over. An Alcoholic doesn't really have the freedom to choose to drink or not, but someone who casually drinks can decide not to drink, because he has enough freedom of will to choose against it.

My main problem with your argument, is that you are taking a few exceptions to freedom and applying it to the whole. I say we have free will but not every action is free. You are taking a few empirically verified uncontrolled actions and applying it to every action. That is a logically fallacy.

Another smaller problem, but it is still there. If no-one has free will how can we hold anyone responsible for their actions? If someone goes on a shooting rampage and kills 10 people, we don't say he had no control over his actions so we shouldn't punish him. No we probably put him in the chair, unless we figure out he is mentally unstable.

Without free will there is no justification for punishment, because we are all just reactionary animals who act out of our instincts. There is no need for criminal law, because really no-one commits crime, because they aren't free to do it.