- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should citizens who are receiving government assistance be allowed to have new children?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:24 pm to weagle1999
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:24 pm to weagle1999
No.
If they get foodstamps or section 8 or anything like that, they should have ti have Norplant implanted until they're off it.
If they get foodstamps or section 8 or anything like that, they should have ti have Norplant implanted until they're off it.
0
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:32 pm to weagle1999
quote:
Proof of sterilization before receiving government assistance is one scenario.
Sounds like a good way to end up with a society full of old people with no one to care for them.
Can we add forced euthanasia to the discussion?
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:36 pm to davyjones
quote:
I don’t like the circumstances of this particular subject either, but constitutionally and simply as a matter of American principle, that suggestion is just not realistic. Nor should it be.
Exactly.
If congress decides it can restrict one group of people from having children, it can decide another group of people cannot have children.
Today, it's welfare recipients. Tomorrow it might be Christians.
Posted on 10/6/25 at 1:42 pm to stout
quote:
We can't constitutionally stop them
Could certainly put restrictions on aid.
Page 5 of 5
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News