re: Pope: “You ain’t pro life”.

quote:

---

1) he is here to Preach his own brand of Presybeterianism. There is no room for intellectual process because he will never consider any alternative view.

---

Do you preach/promote any other truth (as you see it) other than Catholicism? Do you consider alternative views to Catholicism?

I consider alternative views all the time. Just because I always come back to the truth of God's word as faithfully summarized by the Westminster Confession of Faith, doesn't mean I don't consider other view points.

quote:

---

2) Because he is here to Preach, he subjects us to rote talking points, over and over again. Even when a reasonable alternative is presented, he rejects that and returns to Preaching by repeating a rote talking point.

---

Can't the same be said of you? In recent history, it seemed as though that in these discussions, all you did was quote the Catholic Catechism or an article from Catholic Answers, not even giving your own thoughts. You stick to the talking points of the RCC, repeating the same ones over and over again, because you are Catholic. I don't have a problem with you stating what you believe to be true, even if it is repetitive. I don't understand why you have a problem with me doing the same.

quote:

---

3) He holds a very strong personal animus towards the Pope and against Catholicism. He will never miss an opportunity to Preach against the RCC here on Political Talk.

---

I'm interested in religious and moral issues. I like to comment on those types of threads, regardless of whether it is about Catholicism.

quote:

---

4) He uses the same tactics as Satan in his attacks: he distorts facts, he is both Accuser and Judge against the Pope and the RCC. When Bible passages are presented to him that warn against distorting truth, being an Accuser, being judgmental and being vengeful, he dismisses any Bible interpretation that might apply to his behavior.

---

If you would like to show how I'm distorting anything, please do so. You have misquoted me and taken my words out of context in the past, doing exactly what you accuse me of doing. And yes, you make accusations against me. Isn't that wrong, according to your own statement here?

quote:

---

5) He has never engaged in a thoughtful discussion of secular Politics, Policy or Foreign Policy. He doesn't vote in political elections because of his religious beliefs.

---

Have you checked my post history? I've engaged in a lot of discussion of "secular politics, policy or foreign policy". I have spoken about transgenderism, communism, gun rights, abortion, free trade, and all sorts of current events in politics over the years. I followed the Q-thread very closely several years ago and was sorely disappointed in the results of the 2020 election. I even voted for Trump twice and defended him in the past. I voted in the last election, too.

I think you need to get your facts straight before you attack and accuse me.

quote:

---

I'm sure he's a great human being in his real life, but, here on PT, he just doesn't belong. People around PT have come to know me as a guy who talks about Religion a lot, but, that is only the case because I try to respond to Foo's constant and unrelenting attacks on the Catholic Church. So that takes up most of my time here on PT.

If these Religious Threads would be either Anchored or deleted that would help the problem.

We talk as much Religion around here as we talk Politics.

---

I don't create these threads. I just respond to them, as you do.