Started By
Message

re: Artemis keeps having setbacks. Why not use proven 1960's technology.

Posted on 4/18/25 at 10:26 am to
Posted by NoFunWhenSober
Member since Apr 2025
20 posts
Posted on 4/18/25 at 10:26 am to
quote:

FLAWLESS moon landings over and over. all this physics 'n shite getting in the way now.


You act like they didn't do a shite ton of testing. They didn't just throw shite together and land on the moon the first try.

This board is full of crazies.
Posted by FriendofBaruch
Member since Mar 2025
878 posts
Posted on 4/18/25 at 10:30 am to
quote:

Why not use proven 1960's technology.
We should be on the 3rd or 4th generation of Saturn rocketry by now - expanded into smaller and larger models. Why not? Too much government manipulations.

Another point here:

Manned flight requires an enormous increase of certification of safety - as it should - and STILL it is profoundly dangerous in the 20th and 21st centuries. which is a great argument for robotics UNmanned space activity

which of course gets us to the main reason for our fumbling around - that there is no focused purpose and planning for that purpose (see government bureaucracy note above)(and the kleptocrat system that runs it)
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram