- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/26/14 at 7:24 pm to detective barnaby
quote:
So 38 million in oysters outweighs the billions in increased flooding from wetland losses that will continue to occur if nothing is done...sounds like a bad trade off.
I'm not disagreeing with this. Just saying that $38 mil annually is money in the bank, whereas long term proactive measures will have significant costs that may influence decision makers chances of remaining in office.
Popular
Back to top

0




