Started By
Message

re: Containment Dome status???

Posted on 5/9/10 at 8:08 am to
Posted by DeeHorton
Member since Jan 2009
2105 posts
Posted on 5/9/10 at 8:08 am to
I'm no expert, but having read about the system used to seal an exploratory well for later production, fault seems to point to Halliburton as the guilty party. My understanding is the methane gas escape that caused the explosions came directly up from the well, indicating a faulty job of sealing it properly - which was Halliburton's gig.

The failure of backup systems to close the well is another matter.
Posted by BROffshoreTigerFan
Edmond, OK
Member since Oct 2007
10004 posts
Posted on 5/9/10 at 8:29 am to
It's unsure as to who the fault lies with right now.

I've heard that each one of these could have played some part in the tragedy, or was the whole cause. But this is all speculation.

Here's the list of things that could have been the problem:

BOP problems. Seems unlikely because of the successful tests and funtioning of BOP and rams. Not saying that rules out this possibility, but you'd think that it wouldn't have worked 3 days earlier (I know equipment can fail at any time) if it was a faulty unit. Cameron was the manufacturer.

I heard that TO modified a valve w/o consent or notification. That's a big no no. Again, not saying this was the case, but if so, some blame can fall on TO.

As you stated, it could have been a bad cement job, or cement could have gotten down into the BOP preventing it from working correctly. In that case, Halliburton is on the hook also.

Essentially, since BP is the operator, and owns the lease they were drilling on, it faults to BP for now, until RCA's (Root Cause Analysis) come out.

You can bet your arse there will be lots of finger pointing in this one.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram