Started By
Message

re: MLB Trade Deadline Thread

Posted on 7/27/12 at 7:06 pm to
Posted by DEANintheYAY
LEFT COAST
Member since Jan 2008
31975 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 7:06 pm to
quote:

quote:
Profar is the #1 prospect in the minors.

No, he is not.


PROBAR is right??
Posted by DrVinnyBoombatz
Lubbock
Member since Oct 2011
3128 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 7:11 pm to
Yes. He is. And he's number 2 according to Baseball America.
Posted by lsu31always
Team 31™
Member since Jan 2008
108104 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 7:12 pm to
Bundy >>>> Profar.

I think Myers >>>> Profar.
This post was edited on 7/27/12 at 7:13 pm
Posted by SwampDonks
Member since Mar 2008
18342 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 7:15 pm to
Lulz at you linking something Keith Law put together.
Posted by DrVinnyBoombatz
Lubbock
Member since Oct 2011
3128 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 7:24 pm to
What's your problem with Law?

ETA: And if you don't like Law, here is what Jason Parks and Peter Gammons said about Profar:

quote:

SS Jurickson Profar: Called home run before the game; near-elite pure hitter; remarkable bat speed; instincts for barrel-to-ball actions; recognizes pitches very well from both sides of the plate; ultra-competitive; followed Oscar Taveras in batting practice group; visible effort to match the insanely impressive BP session by Taveras; was talking to Peter Gammons during one of his cage cycles who opined that Profar was the top prospect in the game; I agreed; would have agreed regardless of which player he named because he’s Peter Gammons; Profar executed in game action; can shorten swing/alter approach; plays up to the level of competition around him; wouldn’t drown in majors now; shows easy power; 50/55 projection on tool at floor; role 7 player at peak; All-Star at major league level.
This post was edited on 7/27/12 at 7:34 pm
Posted by lsu31always
Team 31™
Member since Jan 2008
108104 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 7:37 pm to
Gammons isn't a Prospect guy.
Posted by DrVinnyBoombatz
Lubbock
Member since Oct 2011
3128 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 7:37 pm to
No, but Jason Parks is. And he is pretty well respected.
Posted by lsu31always
Team 31™
Member since Jan 2008
108104 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 7:38 pm to
Still the third best Prospect today.
Posted by DrVinnyBoombatz
Lubbock
Member since Oct 2011
3128 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 7:43 pm to
Dylan Bundy and Profar are pretty much interchangeable in any prospect rankings. They are also both 19 years old, 2 years younger than Wil Myers.
Posted by lsu31always
Team 31™
Member since Jan 2008
108104 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 7:45 pm to
I am aware of the ages of the three in question. I like Myers more than I like profar. Bundy is no question the best prospect in the minors.
Posted by mattz1122
Member since Oct 2007
55677 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 7:46 pm to
Is Myers ever going to be called up?
Posted by lsu31always
Team 31™
Member since Jan 2008
108104 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 7:47 pm to
Yea. They are shopping frenchy for that purpose
Posted by DrVinnyBoombatz
Lubbock
Member since Oct 2011
3128 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 7:50 pm to
Obviously there is a question if multiple baseball people are saying Profar is the best talent.
Posted by Ninja Looter
Member since Sep 2008
1848 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 8:03 pm to
quote:

I am aware of the ages of the three in question. I like Myers more than I like profar. Bundy is no question the best prospect in the minors.


I like Bundy more than Profar as well, but I don't think anyone should be ridiculed for preferring Profar (especially when they are a homer and can't help it).
Posted by papz
Austin, TX
Member since Jul 2008
9375 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 8:11 pm to
They're essentially 1A and 1B. I believe Jim Callis of Baseball America had Profar as his number one but went with Bundy because most of the scouts he talked to preferred an true ace.

You also have to put in retrospect how much stock they put on his low A numbers at the time of the mid season re-rankings. It was absurd. His numbers, while still excellent, has normalized.

In all honestly, tomato tomatoe. It's not a big deal. One is the consensus number 1 pitching prospect in the game and the other the 1 position prospect in the game.
Posted by DrVinnyBoombatz
Lubbock
Member since Oct 2011
3128 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 8:15 pm to
Oh I know, I said they are basically interchangeable. What is ridiculous is saying Wil Myers is a lot better than Profar, when pretty much no one thinks that.

Here is what Ben Badler (Baseball America) said:
quote:

Not a surprise, but the most impressive prospect in the Futures Game was Jurickson Profar. Love Dylan Bundy, but I'd rather have Profar.

Bundy and Profar are at 2 very premium positions. A ToRP and an elite SS are very desirable. Like you said, it is pretty much which one you prefer.
This post was edited on 7/27/12 at 8:19 pm
Posted by lsu31always
Team 31™
Member since Jan 2008
108104 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

What is ridiculous is saying Wil Myers is a lot better than Profar,

Link?
Posted by DrVinnyBoombatz
Lubbock
Member since Oct 2011
3128 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

I think Myers >>>> Profar


Usually, more than 1 > means you think he is a lot better.
Posted by lsu31always
Team 31™
Member since Jan 2008
108104 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 8:21 pm to
Or it is for the blind to see that it wasn't a mistake.
Posted by DrVinnyBoombatz
Lubbock
Member since Oct 2011
3128 posts
Posted on 7/27/12 at 8:26 pm to
If that's what you meant, than I interpreted it wrong. Usually when I see more than one greater sign, I assume that they are saying a lot more greater than.
This post was edited on 7/27/12 at 8:27 pm
Jump to page
Page First 25 26 27 28 29 ... 59
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 27 of 59Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram