re: Most Overlooked Stat So Far

quote:

---

Name one game that's happened in.....

---

Exactamundo! What game has Jefferson started where the offense had to score more than 38 points to win? Think the playcalling might be a bit different if they had to score more than 38 to win? Have you noticed that on each occasion in the forth quarter when a score was needed, the playcalling and team execution was sufficient to provide the score? And I'll add also the QB play by JJ.

Most of the the bench JJ, start JL group are basing their argument on what might happen in the future. (JJ might have progressed beyond his propensity to throw ints). Most JJ supporters are basing their position on what has already happened (JJ is 4-1 as a starter and protects the ball).

Which provides a more sound basis for predicting the future? What might happen versus what has happened? Time will tell. It appears the coaching staff are basing their decision on what has happened. Thank goodness they are not swayed by the arguments of BT, Robbbob, slacker, the tiger band guy and their group. By the way what happened to Al Bundy. Was he expelled from the group or changed his username?

quote:

---

Which provides a more sound basis for predicting the future? What might happen versus what has happened? Time will tell. It appears the coaching staff are basing their decision on what has happened. Thank goodness they are not swayed by the arguments of BT, Robbbob, slacker, the tiger band guy and their group. By the way what happened to Al Bundy. Was he expelled from the group or changed his username?

---

Really? Link the post where I advocated for JL to start.

I advocate that, to my dismay, our offense is stagnant with a QB that is obviously the one the coaches thinks is our best bet to win ball games. That is not a situation I am too optimistic about.