- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Advocate sportswriter says optimism not good for J. Hill return
Posted on 5/10/13 at 9:53 am to LSUGrad9295
Posted on 5/10/13 at 9:53 am to LSUGrad9295
quote:
Why? Because it contained information that helped explain a complicated court situation?
But it really didn't. It explained 2 of the possible worst outcomes for Hill and blew off the less severe outcomes. This writer should stick to strictly sports and hold back on the legal analysis.
2
Posted on 5/10/13 at 9:54 am to Mie2cents
Advocate;DR
Posted on 5/10/13 at 10:24 am to EarthwormJim
quote:
But it really didn't. It explained 2 of the possible worst outcomes for Hill and blew off the less severe outcomes. This writer should stick to strictly sports and hold back on the legal analysis.
It blew off the less severe and most likely outcomes. Haters are going to be very disappointed when this plays out and he is cleared.
Posted on 5/10/13 at 10:29 am to Mie2cents
Everyone covering LSU sports at the advocate should be fired. Their articles are some of the most poorly written and misinformed you will find
Posted on 5/10/13 at 10:36 am to Mie2cents
The Advovate has become more objective and less myopic when it comes to LSU football. Nothing wrong with that, they're not wearing purple and gold glasses all the time. I think it's a refreshing change.
Posted on 5/10/13 at 11:39 am to ElderTiger
quote:
as good as any paper in the country
Posted on 5/10/13 at 5:56 pm to EarthwormJim
quote:
Why? Because it contained information that helped explain a complicated court situation?
It actually only mentioned the most severe and least likely options. People on probation for a misdemeanor rarely have probation pulled for another misdemeanor. Second, most citizens on probation make appeal to allow them to work, or attend church, or other supervised scheduled activities. It is likely that Hill would be able to get an exemption for football games.
Are the scenarios mention in the article possible? yes...yes they are, but why make a whole article out of unlikely speculation?
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News