- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Damn, what happened to Rivals?
Posted on 3/23/19 at 7:31 pm
Posted on 3/23/19 at 7:31 pm
Do they even know LSU got a commitment. 
3
Posted on 3/23/19 at 8:06 pm to smash williams
probably too busy giving fake profiles with bama offers 3 star ratings.
Posted on 3/23/19 at 8:24 pm to smash williams
They’re too busy blowing each other over how awesome the bootleggers are
Posted on 3/23/19 at 8:38 pm to jtran1988
247 did the same thing
Posted on 3/23/19 at 8:43 pm to Dysp
247 didn’t actually rate him, they had his profile with only a Rivals Rating
Posted on 3/24/19 at 9:44 am to smash williams
Rivals is the only one I check. To me it's a much easier site to navigate and most importantly shows where the offers came without having to scroll.
Seems to me 247 seems to overrate players, see chris currys rankings and it's a major difference between sites. 247 has him as a top 10-15 back for whole class and rivals has him at 48 where he belongs. There's a lot of 4 stars on 247 that should be 3 stars.
Seems to me 247 seems to overrate players, see chris currys rankings and it's a major difference between sites. 247 has him as a top 10-15 back for whole class and rivals has him at 48 where he belongs. There's a lot of 4 stars on 247 that should be 3 stars.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 11:05 am to Dellybelly82
I don't have a sub on any sites anymore but I still check their forums, rivals message board seems like a shitshow.
Biggest discrepancy in the rankings in my opinion is the dedicated camps each site is affiliated with. It creates a bias to an already very subjective process.
Biggest discrepancy in the rankings in my opinion is the dedicated camps each site is affiliated with. It creates a bias to an already very subjective process.
Posted on 3/24/19 at 2:05 pm to smash williams
I think kids should be ranked by the quality of offers they get. Obviously the coaching circles and recruiting coordinators have the best eye and the most resources to evaluate recruits.
Posted on 3/27/19 at 7:50 am to Dellybelly82
quote:
I think kids should be ranked by the quality of offers they get. Obviously the coaching circles and recruiting coordinators have the best eye and the most resources to evaluate recruits.
I agree with the spirit of your post, but coaches are almost as difficult to read as the recruits. Some top recruits won’t even get offers or report offers from schools that aren’t the top tier or whom they’re not really considering. It’d be pretty tough to get a really good read on how good a player is by their offers. Again, though, I think the recruiting services should take offers into account, but they probably already do...it just might not affect predictions in the way you and I would hope.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News