Started By
Message

re: bioshock

Posted on 9/7/08 at 8:04 pm to
Posted by SoonerBorn
The right man in the wrong place
Member since Nov 2005
4674 posts
Posted on 9/7/08 at 8:04 pm to
The game was only good for about half of it. I get the whole "we blurred the lines between a FPS and an RPG" but the novelty of the game wears off quick. And with it being boring, the fact that it was so long actually takes away from the game. The storyline was good, but it's "Game of the Year" not "Book of the Year." If the story's great and the delivery is mediocre it isn't gonna be a good game. Perfect example is Haze. That was a great concept but the delivery was horrible and the game suffered because of it.

And like I said, you don't need to have a phenomenal multiplayer but you have to at least cover all your bases if you're gunna be Game of the Year.
This post was edited on 9/7/08 at 8:05 pm
Posted by Flichter
St. Petersburg, FL
Member since Dec 2007
1021 posts
Posted on 9/8/08 at 8:46 am to
Yeah multiplayer will help you overlook the fact single player gets boring. Most FPS single player gets boring.. once you get to try out all the weapons and meet most of the mobs, unless the story is amazing... meh.

Bioshock had a pretty good story, but even that got pretty predictable about 3/4 through.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram