- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 1/30/13 at 1:41 pm to Toula
i am
Posted on 1/30/13 at 1:43 pm to Toula
Hello!
Posted on 1/30/13 at 1:46 pm to rondo
Water chummed.
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:26 pm to TigerPhan27
accepted Phanny.
Quick and easy.
Quick and easy.
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:29 pm to Toula
enjoy your cy young winner
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:32 pm to TigerPhan27
i'm now looking to trade 2 for 1 or 1 for draft picks
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:33 pm to TigerPhan27
Who are you dropping from your keepers, Phan?
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:34 pm to reddman
I'm not prepared to make that decision as of now. I'm still trying to completely overhaul my roster in the offseason. Almost done
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:35 pm to reddman
Anyone have any interest in changing the lineup requirements from 5 SP and 3 RP to something like 3 SP, 3 RP and 2 P?
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:35 pm to TigerPhan27
quote:
I'm not prepared to make that decision as of now. I'm still trying to completely overhaul my roster in the offseason. Almost done
You certainly have blown it the frick up.
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:38 pm to reddman
No...gtfo with that shite
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:40 pm to rondo
Just passing along suggestions I've received. No need to be a cockwipe.
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:40 pm to reddman
quote:
No need to be a cockwipe.
I don't think he can help it
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:43 pm to reddman
I think the ramification of having a 25 IP minimum IP requirement needs to be looked at before we decide on that. It seems that would allow owners to to stock their lineup with relievers, gain much better ratios, and still make the minimum 25 IP. It would also increase Chapman's value, for whoever owns him.
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:45 pm to EarlyBird
Yeah... Whoever owns Chapman
They would want that
They would want that
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:46 pm to EarlyBird
(no message)
This post was edited on 1/30/13 at 3:47 pm
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:48 pm to EarlyBird
quote:
It seems that would allow owners to to stock their lineup with relievers, gain much better ratios, and still make the minimum 25 IP.
But then they would be punting QS, which is never a good idea.
As for Chapman, it doesn't really do much to help him, considering its only 5 days out of like 150 that he would need to be in a RP spot. It isn't really an advantage at all.
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:51 pm to reddman
Well it increases the flexibility of his usefulness, considering there's no guarantee that he'll remain a RP or SP. Whoever owns him would no longer have to take that into account when making a keeper decision.
Posted on 1/30/13 at 3:52 pm to EarlyBird
hes a keeper regardless of what position he plays.
Page 20 of 70
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News