re: Did Hillary ever speak - concede?

quote:

---

She's busier than a one legged witch in an arse kicking contest destroying every self incriminating piece of evidence currently in her possesion. Trouble is, she is the one whose arse got kicked.

---

She lied under oath. She destroyed documents under subpoena and that she was required by law to keep. Destroying Federal records -- 3 years in prison.

And as I never ever ever ever get tired of saying, she said it from her own stupid mouth.

Under oath Clinton adamantly maintains that her attorneys viewed her emails:

“CLINTON: I know that because there was an exhaustive search done under the supervision of my attorneys, and that is exactly the outcome. We turned over every work related email, in fact, as somebody referred to earlier, we turned over too many.”

LINK

Of course they unilaterally attempted to destroy 33,000 federal records.

quote:

---

Remember when the media toppled a President over 18 minutes of blank tape and a burglary? My how times have changed. 18 minutes of blank tape pales in comparason to 33,000 federal records.

---

The Obama DOJ has been totally corrupt.

At least 3 tracks obstructed by the DOJ

1. Emails on unauthorized server and shared with persons with no clearance/destruction of same.

2. She lied under oath and destroyed evidence under subpoena.

3. Taking favors from foreign governments while in office.

Here is something to make you wonder.

E. Howard Hunt, the operative who led the Watergate Break-in in 1972 was allegedly also arested in Dealy Plaza on 11/22/63.



"The Rockefeller Commission reported in 1975 that they investigated the allegation that Hunt and Sturgis, on behalf of the CIA, participated in the assassination of Kennedy.[5] The final report of that commission stated that witnesses who testified that the "derelicts" bore a resemblance to Hunt or Sturgis "were not shown to have any qualification in photo identification beyond that possessed by an average layman".[6] Their report also stated that FBI Agent Lyndal L. Shaneyfelt, "a nationally-recognized expert in photoidentification and photoanalysis" with the FBI photographic laboratory, had concluded from photo comparison that none of the men were Hunt or Sturgis.[7] In 1979, the House Select Committee on Assassinations reported that forensic anthropologists had again analyzed and compared the photographs of the "tramps" with those of Hunt and Sturgis, as well as with photographs of Thomas Vallee, Daniel Carswell, and Fred Lee Crisman.[8] According to the Committee, only Crisman resembled any of the tramps; but the same Committee determined that he was not in Dealey Plaza on the day of the assassination.[8]" wiki





Another view of the tramps.