Started By
Message

re: FDR was an awful president and MacArthur was an awful general.

Posted on 10/28/21 at 12:15 am to
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98415 posts
Posted on 10/28/21 at 12:15 am to
That's a point a lot of critics miss entirely. Whatever the economic merits or lack thereof, there were a great many desperate unemployed men wondering how they were going to feed their families. The new Deal put them on payrolls and gave them a little hope instead of hanging out in the street listening to some rabble-rouser promising them a future in the coming revolution.

The choice wasn't between the New Deal and Capitalism. The choice was between the New Deal and something much more radical. For every critic who thought Roosevelt was going too far, there were even more critics who thought he wasn't going far enough. FDRs biggest threat in the 1936 election wouldn't have been from the GOP, it would have been from Huey Long, who wanted to confiscate all personal fortunes greater than ten million dollars and nationalize most industries.
This post was edited on 10/28/21 at 1:35 am
Posted by biglego
Ask your mom where I been
Member since Nov 2007
76634 posts
Posted on 10/28/21 at 12:23 am to
Exactly. Desperate times drive people to desperate measures. Men must work. When huge numbers of men can’t find work, and they’re watching their kids go hungry, well that’s a recipe for upheaval.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
262133 posts
Posted on 10/28/21 at 8:21 am to
quote:

there were even more critics who thought he wasn't going far enough.



Communists and socialists.

No one in their right mind would agree.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram