re: LSU vs USC

quote:

---

Yes, and telling you to do the same when you predicted LSU fans would be upset would look foolish b/c it would likely happen

---

I don't know why you'd tell me that because predicting things in the future was not what I was talking about.

Are you still not understanding what I was telling you? Are you really this thickheaded? Are you really thinking what I said had to do with what you say about the future? Geez.....

quote:

---

There is nothing for me to acknowledge. I did many pages ago. You just seemed to ignore it and continue on your podium, even when you stated you would not make issue anymore.

---

As long as you acknowledge you weren't around in 2003 and you're just guessing, it's cool.

quote:

---

Because you do not seem to get it. That is you again, claiming someone posted something to prove your point that they said it. Then challenge that they said it, even though it was not said in the first place

---

Please spare us this nickel and dime crybaby bullshite. Uhhwhaaha "I didn't say this, I didn't say that". You're fool because you think you have to say something directly in order for people to know what you're talking about.

quote:

---

I did not imply that I was here prior to 2003

---

Someone could interpret that when you make a claim in such a strong manner that you must've been witness to make such a strong claim.

quote:

---

The two have no connection (me being here prior to 03 and the discussions here prior to 03). You seem more interested in how long I have been on this site than anyone else.

---

No, just making sure it's crystal clear you acknowledge that you didn't witness what you claim.

quote:

---

No. The problem lies with your chronic false assumptions about what one "means" in a post.

---

Actually, the problem lies in the fact that you think in order for someone to know what you're saying you have to directly say it. Semantics. Take your tit for tat bullshite to a USC board.

quote:

---

In this case there is no connection b/t me bearing witness to prior to 03 and what was or was not posted here prior to 03, yet you falsely assumed I meant I was here

---

Not false. When you state what you did in such a strong manner what you claim, one can interpret you think you witness what was or wasn't said back then.

As long as you acknowledge you weren't around then to witness it, that's fine. ANd I'm not proven incorrect. I'm actually proven to be true on any point.

quote:

---

Then YOU have a difficult time swallowing YOUR pride when you find out (first hand --a word you frequently use) that it is not what I meant.

---

Nope. It took you a long time to realize what I was getting at. Now, that you've acknowledged, albeit in somewhat of an indirect manner that you didnt' witness what you claim, that's fine.

quote:

---

Understand first hand? Straight from me. Yet you continue to badger as you do others, all while intermittently resorting to attempts to personally attack, as you have in the past.

---

Nope, this would have ended a long time ago had you decided not to try to prove me wrong as if I was arguing that what you claimed wasn't happening back then.