- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Pastor Spell Under House Arrest with Ankle Monitor
Posted on 4/26/20 at 11:53 am to Darth_Vader
Posted on 4/26/20 at 11:53 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Downvote this post all you want. That’s all you can do though because you can’t refute it.
Multiple people in this thread have pointed out Supreme Court supported cases that support state rights during a state of emergency.
Our Forefathers also established the Executive, Judicial, and Legislative branches to hold each other in check. IMO this is an example of that. Those who disagree that claims it's an infringement have a legal right to challenge it. People have and have been overruled. That's what is being pointed out here.
You can spout all you want about sheep and claiming not listening in history class but some of you come off as you stopped reading anything in history after the Constitution with that logic. You don't have to agree with it, but there's a valid argument on both sides and has long been the debate among those in Constitutional law.
2
Posted on 4/26/20 at 11:57 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
Multiple people in this thread have pointed out Supreme Court supported cases that support state rights during a state of emergency.
It certainly suppresses the right to assemble which is a founding pillar of this country. I suppose we will see more and more "emergencies." Climate change will be a big one.
Sadly we can declare emergencies to suppress the population over many things we don't really need to. Legal =|=. right.
Posted on 4/26/20 at 12:27 pm to BluegrassBelle
quote:
Multiple people in this thread have pointed out Supreme Court supported cases that support state rights during a state of emergency.
Our Forefathers also established the Executive, Judicial, and Legislative branches to hold each other in check. IMO this is an example of that. Those who disagree that claims it's an infringement have a legal right to challenge it. People have and have been overruled. That's what is being pointed out here.
You can spout all you want about sheep and claiming not listening in history class but some of you come off as you stopped reading anything in history after the Constitution with that logic. You don't have to agree with it, but there's a valid argument on both sides and has long been the debate among those in Constitutional law.
The level of mental gymnastics progressives will go to in order to justify shitting on their own constitutional rights is amazing.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News