- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Surprise! House Democrats Have New Evidence To Send To Senate!
Posted on 1/15/20 at 11:05 am to LuckyTiger
Posted on 1/15/20 at 11:05 am to LuckyTiger
I have a question to the lawyers on this board!
Is it legit for the Senate to say we will only look at evidence/witnesses that was presented during the House hearings, since Nancy/Adam/Nads say the articles they are presenting already show clear evidence of guilt? In addition, allow the Defense to present their evidence/witnesses since they were not given that chance in the House hearings?
To me, that seems like the perfect strategy for the R's.
That basically would mean the same lame hearsay witnesses can be called, plus whomever the R's decide to call and then vote on that.
Is it legit for the Senate to say we will only look at evidence/witnesses that was presented during the House hearings, since Nancy/Adam/Nads say the articles they are presenting already show clear evidence of guilt? In addition, allow the Defense to present their evidence/witnesses since they were not given that chance in the House hearings?
To me, that seems like the perfect strategy for the R's.
That basically would mean the same lame hearsay witnesses can be called, plus whomever the R's decide to call and then vote on that.
0
Page 2 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News