- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/24/19 at 11:54 am to Antonio Moss
quote:
Why is this relevant?
?
Isn't it obvious?
Let's say that California has... oh 30 million legal citizens.
And ten million non-citizens, including illegals residing in Calfornia.
The Census indicates that 40 million people live in California, whether only 30 million are citizens and thus legally able to vote in Federal Elections or not.
Meanwhile South Carolina has far less non-citizens residing in it - a pattern true for a lot of Red States I think.
Should (and Is?) Calfornia awarded electors and a proportional number of Representatives based on a population of 40 million?
Sounds wonky, but essentially my pulled-from-the-arse numbers would indicate that California has 33% more throw-weight in packing the House with little SJW's and electing witches.
And I don't like that.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News