Started By
Message

re: NR Editorial: Obamacare Needs an Out-of-Court Settlement

Posted on 12/18/18 at 8:48 am to
Posted by BamaAtl
South of North
Member since Dec 2009
22253 posts
Posted on 12/18/18 at 8:48 am to
quote:

Constitutional rights be damned... amirite?



This has already been litigated multiple times - no Constitutional rights were impeded by the ACA.

That you don't accept that is your own failing, not the law's.
Posted by SDVTiger
Cabo San Lucas
Member since Nov 2011
78453 posts
Posted on 12/18/18 at 8:49 am to
You must be so mad having to realize your saviors legacy was flushed down the toilet like the turd it was
Posted by The Maj
Member since Sep 2016
27982 posts
Posted on 12/18/18 at 8:50 am to
quote:

no Constitutional rights were impeded by the ACA.


Yeah, this judge disagrees with your assessment...

His ruling holds that the individual mandate can no longer be constitutionally justified as a tax now that it is set at zero


So, in your opinion, constitutional rights be damned.... amirite...
This post was edited on 12/18/18 at 8:51 am
Posted by BBONDS25
Member since Mar 2008
49549 posts
Posted on 12/18/18 at 8:52 am to
quote:

This has already been litigated multiple times - no Constitutional rights were impeded by the ACA.


It relied upon the penalty to be constitutional. No penalty changes things. You called the Texas judge crazy. Which portion of his decision,specifically do you find craziest. What is the standard for overturning on appeal, and how is that standard met.


Isn’t it beautiful? We all still have our guns, and you don’t even get to keep Obamacare. It’s beautiful.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram