Started By
Message

re: .

Posted on 11/2/18 at 12:31 pm to
Posted by cahoots
Member since Jan 2009
9134 posts
Posted on 11/2/18 at 12:31 pm to
quote:

It's factored into healthcare now.


I'm aware

quote:

In fact... Here is something you may not know... Pre-existing conditions were covered PRIOR to Obamacare.



Not in the same way. There's a reason why many Republicans were against the PEC provisions of obamacare at one point
Posted by Johnpettigrew
Louisiana
Member since Sep 2017
1650 posts
Posted on 11/2/18 at 3:54 pm to
YES not in the same way as redistributing the cost to otherwise healthy non users of insurance. That’s why it was so important for ACA to have young healthy people paying obscure amounts in premiums. The problem was never pre existing it was pre existing actually paying their fair proportion of usage. That’s the problem with it. The healthy get stuck holding the bag for unhealthy, and a lot of times self inflicted, people. ACA completely changed the formulas on How much each individual paid into the pool. Also for years, a woman of child bearing age could get much lower premium if child birth was removed from the policy. Would you consider having a child a choice just like say breast implants which are not covered?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram