re: Do we have any evidence that Trump banged Stormy?

quote:

---

If he paid her 130 grand and didn't bang her, then he's most definitely failing at the art of the deal

---

It doesn’t make a difference to me either way if he banged her. That’s btwn Trump and Melania. I don’t give a shite. It wouldn’t have affected my vote. I’m just saying that avoiding the constant news attention to this skank a month before the election was probably worth $130k to him, to his campaign and to his family.

During that time rando women that there’s no evidence Trump ever even met were showing up and saying he felt them up on airplanes. Instigated and promoted by left leaning news sources and represented by professional Democrat attention whore attorneys who are no more ethical than Cohen. People believed these women, despite no evidence.

I guess I’m just saying that plenty of people would have believed Stormy, regardless of whether it was true. And it would have been all over the news, damaging and distracting people from his campaign. Because there is unanimous belief on a board full of Trump supporters that Trump banged these whores, and it’s currently all over the news.

These women now have free publicity and attention. And are “represented” by publicists disguising themselves as lawyers. They have plenty of motivation and assistance and more to gain by lying than telling the truth.

When Stormy first showed up. I thought Trump banged her. The longer it goes on, the more the $130k to keep us all from discussing it seems like a bargain, and it makes total sense. It’s also made me doubt whether he really plowed her. If he had, the price would have been higher. Stormy’s damages from her ridiculous lawsuit are that this payout is an acknowledgment of how cheap, disposable and disgusting she really is.