Started By
Message

re: FISA Application Breakdown

Posted on 7/22/18 at 8:30 pm to
Posted by JuiceTerry
Roond the Scheme
Member since Apr 2013
40868 posts
Posted on 7/22/18 at 8:30 pm to
quote:

you can't surmise anything from changing length of a given section.
Yes you can. You can surmise that information was added to the applications, and that it was enough for 3 different federal judges to approve.

Attacking a Fisa warrant on Carter "Please love me, mother Russia" Page is about as Quixotic a quest as there is, but making up shite that isn't true about it looks even dumber.
Posted by BeefDawg
Atlanta
Member since Sep 2012
4747 posts
Posted on 7/22/18 at 8:53 pm to
quote:

Yes you can. You can surmise that information was added to the applications, and that it was enough for 3 different federal judges to approve.

Attacking a Fisa warrant on Carter "Please love me, mother Russia" Page is about as Quixotic a quest as there is, but making up shite that isn't true about it looks even dumber.

I showed several instances of the application flat out lying.

I showed where completely unverified information from unverified sources was used.

I showed where unverified news articles were used.

I showed where the FBI avoided informing the FISC who funded the Dossier.

And I showed where the FBI knew the Yahoo article was sourced by Steele, and yet they continued to used it like a 2nd independent corroborating source, then continued to lie in each renewal claiming they didn’t believe Steele was the source.

They never asked Isikoff who sourced his article, so it’s an irrefutable attempt at obfuscation and willful dishonesty.


But you want to sit here and not only avoid discussing those issues, but then insist that we’re supposed to believe they followed protocol with the rest of it???

You really don’t understand the concept of “credibility”, and how being wildly dishonest in the unredacted parts we can see makes it absurdly impossible to believe the redacted parts are truthful and prudent.


I’m sure the concept of honesty is hard for your type, so I don’t expect you to understand.
Posted by Jbird
In Bidenville with EthanL
Member since Oct 2012
73491 posts
Posted on 7/23/18 at 7:41 am to
quote:

You can surmise that information was added to the applications, and that it was enough for 3 different federal judges to approve.
Was all of the "new" data redacted?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram