Started By
Message

re: Gasser didn't testify in McKnight case; Guilty of manslaughter

Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:27 pm to
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
81069 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:27 pm to
The intersection doesn’t matter other than it being cosmically coincidental, but the testimony that the prior confrontation started in traffic, was escalated by Gasser, and ended in a physical confrontation at the gas station would speak to the credibility of his claim now that despite this confrontation starting in traffic, escalating, and ending in physical confrontation, THIS one was in total self-defense.
This post was edited on 1/26/18 at 12:30 pm
Posted by PearlJam
NotBeardEaves
Member since Aug 2014
13908 posts
Posted on 1/26/18 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

The intersection doesn’t matter other than it being cosmically coincidental
which also likely makes it more prejudicial and less probative.

quote:

THIS one was in total self-defense.
I'm still not following on why the other incident offers anything probative related to this one? What about that incident speaks toward the self defense claim here?

I'm not arguing, I'm really curious, as I'm not seeing it. Not saying it isn't there.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram