- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Should this trade be allowed?
Posted on 11/2/17 at 9:53 pm to Large Farva
Posted on 11/2/17 at 9:53 pm to Large Farva
It’s a terrible trade but bad trades should not be vetoed.
Why punish someone for getting a deal done?
A terrible trade is not the same as a vetoable trade.
Why punish someone for getting a deal done?
A terrible trade is not the same as a vetoable trade.
This post was edited on 11/2/17 at 10:16 pm
Posted on 11/2/17 at 10:30 pm to CBandits82
quote:
A terrible trade is not the same as a vetoable trade.
I agree 99% of the time but the guy is getting nothing of value in return. I wouldn't have an issue with that being vetoed even if it's not clear collusion. I don't recall a trade in any of my leagues being that bad though.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News