- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Redskins Win... banning offensive Trademark names is unconstitutional according to SCOTUS
Posted on 6/19/17 at 10:17 am to ThePTExperience1969
Posted on 6/19/17 at 10:17 am to ThePTExperience1969
quote:
How this provision in the Lanham Act remained for so long despite clearly breaching Amendment 1 makes literally zero sense
Its easy to believe when you have left wing judges playing god from the bench. Upholding bullshite rulings when they know the shite is unconstitutional. They try to convince themselves that freedom of speech only goes so far.
1
Posted on 6/19/17 at 10:33 am to Kracka
The fact that the decision was so slanted by SCOTUS just shows how easy of a decision and just how bullshite the claim was to begin with.
The fact that the US patent office did this is even more disturbing. Not to get too political, but the previous administration corrupted so many federal agencies by using them as political arms to enforce ideology. This clearly unconstitutianl case is just but one example.
The fact that the US patent office did this is even more disturbing. Not to get too political, but the previous administration corrupted so many federal agencies by using them as political arms to enforce ideology. This clearly unconstitutianl case is just but one example.
This post was edited on 6/19/17 at 10:34 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News