- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: U.S. chief justice alarmed at Trump
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:19 am to KeyserSoze999
Posted on 4/27/17 at 9:19 am to KeyserSoze999
quote:
she falsely stated her husband had not served in the Bosnian Serb army in the 1990s after Yugoslavia's collapse.
quote:
for trivial lies or omissions.
If you didn't know:
quote:
The ethnic cleansing campaign that took place throughout areas controlled by the Bosnian Serbs targeted Muslim Bosniaks and Bosnian Croats. The ethnic cleansing campaign included unlawful confinement, murder, rape, sexual assault, torture, beating, robbery, and inhumane treatment of civilians; the targeting of political leaders, intellectuals, and professionals; the unlawful deportation and transfer of civilians; the unlawful shelling of civilians; the unlawful appropriation and plunder of real and personal property; the destruction of homes and businesses; and the destruction of places of worship.
In the 1990s, several authorities asserted that ethnic cleansing as carried out by elements of the Bosnian Serb army was genocide. These included a resolution by the United Nations General Assembly and three convictions for genocide in German courts (the convictions were based upon a wider interpretation of genocide than that used by international courts). In 2005, the United States Congress passed a resolution declaring that "the Serbian policies of aggression and ethnic cleansing meet the terms defining genocide".
quote:
for trivial lies or omissions.
![](https://i.imgur.com/YqSvLTj.gif)
Posted on 4/27/17 at 11:00 am to Damone
A whole bunch of people here just don't understand how appellate law works. Yes, lying about serving in an army that committed war crimes is probably not trivial. But as an appellate court they're not just ruling for this one specific case, their opinion is going to have to set out some explicit standards for interpreting this statute so lower courts can use them, so this issue isn't constantly before SCOTUS every time someone lies. That's why Roberts is testing the bounds of the government's argument.
This post was edited on 4/27/17 at 11:02 am
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)