Started By
Message

re: Why Didn't Bama Tackle Clemson's Recievers on the Last Play?

Posted on 1/19/17 at 8:52 pm to
Posted by zzgobucky
Madison
Member since Sep 2016
1748 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 8:52 pm to
add this dipshit to the list.
I get the difference, everyone knows the game/half can't end on a defensive penalty. I'm talking about the concept off intentionally holding the other team, whether it be on offense to run off clock and end the game or defense to run off clock so the offense can only run one more play with clock at zero
Posted by UnoMe
Here
Member since Dec 2007
5674 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 10:15 pm to
The only dipshits are people like you and others to remotely think this would be a good plan of action, in the biggest game of the year. Just think if Alabama did this and Clemson still scores, that would be a bigger fall out than if Alabama does it and works.

quote:

I get the difference,


Ok, so Alabama and The Ravens are in the same "concept"
one is one offense and about to win with a holding penalty and one is about to extend the game with a holding penalty, but I'm the dipshit.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram