Started By
Message

re: Why Didn't Bama Tackle Clemson's Recievers on the Last Play?

Posted on 1/19/17 at 8:45 pm to
Posted by UnoMe
Here
Member since Dec 2007
5674 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 8:45 pm to
quote:

I love these kind of posts it really shows who the idiots are



quote:

Ravens already executed it to perfection early this year it's only a matter of time before other teams catch on



Hello, Mr. IDIOT...
The Ravens had the ball and tackled defenders to run out the clock on a punt, game can end on offensive penalty. Ravens win, Good strategy.

Alabama on Defense vs Ravens on Offense= zzgobucky being the IDIOT.
Posted by mizzoubuckeyeiowa
Member since Nov 2015
35825 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 8:52 pm to
What's sort of lost in this...

Is that it appears Bama did everything possible to commit a penalty on the final play.

The CB just couldn't wrangle the Clemson guy who squirted around his attempted takedown...after the other receiver was held blocking his path.
Posted by zzgobucky
Madison
Member since Sep 2016
1748 posts
Posted on 1/19/17 at 8:52 pm to
add this dipshit to the list.
I get the difference, everyone knows the game/half can't end on a defensive penalty. I'm talking about the concept off intentionally holding the other team, whether it be on offense to run off clock and end the game or defense to run off clock so the offense can only run one more play with clock at zero
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram