- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Start an Investigation
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:50 am to 75503Tiger
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:50 am to 75503Tiger
The non targeting call, and then not even reviewing it was blatant. Then they called one of A&M a few plays later and tossed that kid. What was the difference?
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:54 am to Tiger Nation 84
One player wore red and the other maroon...It is all corrupt. Too much money involved for it not to be. TV ratings will be a big factor in picking the playoff teams.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:54 am to Tiger Nation 84
The difference was explained.
The BAMA player hit a running back that had the football. The TAMU player hit the running back on a block with his head turned making him "defenseless". Now not saying I agree this is what was given as the excuse.
The BAMA player hit a running back that had the football. The TAMU player hit the running back on a block with his head turned making him "defenseless". Now not saying I agree this is what was given as the excuse.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:17 am to Tiger Nation 84
jThere was no difference between the blatant non call against Bama and then the ejection of the Aggie player . Then the league tells CBS according to Danielson that the Bama hit on the Aggie player, " The aggie player wasn't defenseless. " Hell why even have the targeting call if that's the answer. yet when LSU plays Mizzou , we have no flags yet Ritter and his crew over in B'ham stops play and reviews to tall targeting against us on the punt. That is absolutely a crock of manure.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:24 am to Tiger Nation 84
quote:
The non targeting call, and then not even reviewing it was blatant. Then they called one of A&M a few plays later and tossed that kid. What was the difference?
That seriously was as blatant as you will ever see. Unbelievable.. But I guess when it comes to Bama, not so much. This has been going on with them for a really long time.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:34 am to Tiger Nation 84
quote:
What was the difference?
One was a defenseless player. One was not.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:36 am to Tiger Nation 84
quote:
Start an Investigation
The non targeting call, and then not even reviewing it was blatant. Then they called one of A&M a few plays later and tossed that kid. What was the difference?
One was a kick returner that was running up the field. He wasn't in the process of being tackled and was scanning the field. The other was a running back engaged with the guy who intercepted the ball about to make the tackle. The guy also had his hand in Harris' face where he couldn't see anything. Then another player lunches himself into Harris who can see nothing and is the definition of defenseless. Hope this helps you in your quest for the almighty conspiracy.
Posted on 10/23/16 at 12:28 pm to Tiger Nation 84
quote:
Then they called one of A&M a few plays later and tossed that kid. What was the difference?
One was a ball carrier and one was not
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News