Started By
Message

re: Start an Investigation

Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:50 am to
Posted by Tiger Nation 84
Member since Dec 2011
36554 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:50 am to
The non targeting call, and then not even reviewing it was blatant. Then they called one of A&M a few plays later and tossed that kid. What was the difference?
Posted by LSUStar
Medellin
Member since Sep 2009
10678 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:54 am to
One player wore red and the other maroon...It is all corrupt. Too much money involved for it not to be. TV ratings will be a big factor in picking the playoff teams.
Posted by KLSU
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2003
10463 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 8:54 am to
The difference was explained.

The BAMA player hit a running back that had the football. The TAMU player hit the running back on a block with his head turned making him "defenseless". Now not saying I agree this is what was given as the excuse.
Posted by windhammontanatigers
windham-stanford, montana
Member since Nov 2009
4993 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:17 am to
jThere was no difference between the blatant non call against Bama and then the ejection of the Aggie player . Then the league tells CBS according to Danielson that the Bama hit on the Aggie player, " The aggie player wasn't defenseless. " Hell why even have the targeting call if that's the answer. yet when LSU plays Mizzou , we have no flags yet Ritter and his crew over in B'ham stops play and reviews to tall targeting against us on the punt. That is absolutely a crock of manure.
Posted by Mike da Tigah
Bravo Romeo Lima Alpha
Member since Feb 2005
59690 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:24 am to
quote:

The non targeting call, and then not even reviewing it was blatant. Then they called one of A&M a few plays later and tossed that kid. What was the difference?


That seriously was as blatant as you will ever see. Unbelievable.. But I guess when it comes to Bama, not so much. This has been going on with them for a really long time.

Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George, LA
Member since Aug 2004
78737 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:34 am to
quote:

What was the difference?


One was a defenseless player. One was not.
Posted by Aman
Alabama
Member since Mar 2010
5181 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 9:36 am to
quote:


Start an Investigation
The non targeting call, and then not even reviewing it was blatant. Then they called one of A&M a few plays later and tossed that kid. What was the difference?




One was a kick returner that was running up the field. He wasn't in the process of being tackled and was scanning the field. The other was a running back engaged with the guy who intercepted the ball about to make the tackle. The guy also had his hand in Harris' face where he couldn't see anything. Then another player lunches himself into Harris who can see nothing and is the definition of defenseless. Hope this helps you in your quest for the almighty conspiracy.
Posted by Lsuchs
Member since Apr 2013
8073 posts
Posted on 10/23/16 at 12:28 pm to
quote:

Then they called one of A&M a few plays later and tossed that kid. What was the difference?


One was a ball carrier and one was not
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram