- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: What am I missing on Franz Kafka?
Posted on 6/9/16 at 8:04 am to WG_Dawg
Posted on 6/9/16 at 8:04 am to WG_Dawg
Kafka is a fine writer, but nowhere near the titan of literature his legend has been made out to be.
In the 20th century serious literary circles started to move away from merit-based reviews, critiques, etc and began to give way to fanboyism and conflating the personal life of the author and their work- famous and/or prolific authors became as much a character as their actual fictional characters in terms of evaluating a story's merit. This tendency never really left and has proliferated and been established with a religious fervor in academic institutions from grade school to grad school.
The seeds for this new approach to critical analysis may have been planted even earlier- in many ways authors like Mark Twain and Jules Verne became even bigger than their fiction- but you really see this cliquish mindset in the literature world start to take root in the twenties when you had the avente-garde Fitzgeralds, Hemingways, Faulkners, and Steins cavorting around. They were uber-celebrity playboys and girls of their day and critics couldn't help but get caught up in it.
As an example, Gertrude Stein is among the- if not the- single most overrated and unjustifiably idolized figure in all of "serious" American literature; her legacy and supposed import to the craft is a total academic fabrication.
Literary scholars love Kafka as a character, his life-story seems so poetically tragic. All that said, I find Metamorphosis a fantastic read.
In the 20th century serious literary circles started to move away from merit-based reviews, critiques, etc and began to give way to fanboyism and conflating the personal life of the author and their work- famous and/or prolific authors became as much a character as their actual fictional characters in terms of evaluating a story's merit. This tendency never really left and has proliferated and been established with a religious fervor in academic institutions from grade school to grad school.
The seeds for this new approach to critical analysis may have been planted even earlier- in many ways authors like Mark Twain and Jules Verne became even bigger than their fiction- but you really see this cliquish mindset in the literature world start to take root in the twenties when you had the avente-garde Fitzgeralds, Hemingways, Faulkners, and Steins cavorting around. They were uber-celebrity playboys and girls of their day and critics couldn't help but get caught up in it.
As an example, Gertrude Stein is among the- if not the- single most overrated and unjustifiably idolized figure in all of "serious" American literature; her legacy and supposed import to the craft is a total academic fabrication.
Literary scholars love Kafka as a character, his life-story seems so poetically tragic. All that said, I find Metamorphosis a fantastic read.
This post was edited on 6/9/16 at 8:21 am
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News