Started By
Message

re: Joe Lunardi Bracketology 2/11/16

Posted on 2/11/16 at 10:41 am to
Posted by LSUButt
Lowcountry
Member since Jan 2006
14931 posts
Posted on 2/11/16 at 10:41 am to
But the difference is that we also have no bad losses, and all of our losses in the SEC are on the road against the top of the league. Sure, it would have been HUGE to snag a victory, but we've lost a couple of extremely tough games.

Personally, I think the eye test goes into a lot of the committee members ruling. Watching LSU vs Okie, UF, USC...we lost all those but battled, competed, and you can tell we are a quality team that would draw MASSES in the tourney.

Unless we got 4-3 and bounced early in the SECT, I think we get in. Either by 12-6 in conference and winning 1 or 2 in the tourney, or 13-5 in conference.
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
127582 posts
Posted on 2/11/16 at 10:44 am to
quote:

Either by 12-6 in conference and winning 1 or 2 in the tourney, or 13-5 in conference.

Talk about some sweating-out scenarios.
Posted by LSUButt
Lowcountry
Member since Jan 2006
14931 posts
Posted on 2/11/16 at 10:44 am to
Also, Lunardi's bracketology has a GREAT breakdown of each team if you click on them.

For instance, Indiana is an 8-seed and is 1-1 vs top 50...LSU is 2-4 and 3 of those losses on the road. It would have been awesome to win, but going on the road playing a top school is difficult as Hell to win.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram