- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why does GA Tech not recruit better?
Posted on 1/29/16 at 8:26 pm to saintsfan22
Posted on 1/29/16 at 8:26 pm to saintsfan22
OK, so lots of people here blame actual handicaps of the school, but you say they underachieve. That means they could easily do much better. That raises the obvious question....why do you think they underachieve?
1
Posted on 1/29/16 at 8:41 pm to GAAtty70
Well for starters it's not like we don't have relatively recent proof that they can excel in athletics. O'leary and Cremins worked around the same academics. In football the coach's system is what holds them back from being consistently good(I mean 8-9 wins every year) in football, so that's solvable.
People keep saying academics but even Harvard massaged things so they could be successful in basketball. UNC's a great school so how did they solve their problem with keeping athletes eligible? They made a major so they wouldn't have to go to class. UNC wanted it bad enough, Tech doesn't.
People keep saying academics but even Harvard massaged things so they could be successful in basketball. UNC's a great school so how did they solve their problem with keeping athletes eligible? They made a major so they wouldn't have to go to class. UNC wanted it bad enough, Tech doesn't.
This post was edited on 1/29/16 at 8:42 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News